Discussion:
Jane Fonda Kerry uses the Medals he pretended to throw away.
Add Reply
Kerry Wants to TAX Hell Out of Us ALL
2004-02-16 23:09:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Look at our casualties every day in Iraq
since Bush declared the fighting over,
sometime last year.
That was May 1, 2003.

Sure you Dems want to continue comparing 2003-2004 _Iraq_ to 1954-1975
_Nam_?

G.I. deaths in Iraq = 500+

March 19th, 2003 to present;

i.e., less than one year.

G.I. deaths in Nam = 58,000+

1954 (U.S. military advisors and aid to French at Dien Bien Phu) to
April 30th, 1975 (Fall of Saigon);

i.e., 21 years.

Here's what's happening for grassroot members of the Democrat Party:

http://www.f16viper.org/eject.mpg

IOW, they're bailing out as the Party crashes and burns.

The Red Flag of the Clinton-run socialist Democrat Party has faded in
the 21st century sun to surrender monkey white.

Rodham-Clinton legacy:

2002 - Clinton Admits: "I Refused Bin Laden Extradition Offer" - Audio:

http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919

1993 - Clinton controls White House while Democrats control Senate,
House, state legislatures, governorships.

2004 - Republicans own all that.

Why?

Clinton lies and scandals.

1998 - Just another distraction from Tail-Gate(?):

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html

2003 - from Clinton:

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp

What happened to the strong on national defense, space pioneering,
physical fitness advocating, middle class tax cutting Democratic Party
of JFK?
Perry
2004-02-17 02:13:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kerry Wants to TAX Hell Out of Us ALL
Look at our casualties every day in Iraq
since Bush declared the fighting over,
sometime last year.
That was May 1, 2003.
Sure you Dems want to continue comparing 2003-2004 _Iraq_ to 1954-1975
_Nam_?
G.I. deaths in Iraq = 500+
that's about 5 min on D day when they hit the beaches.
Post by Kerry Wants to TAX Hell Out of Us ALL
March 19th, 2003 to present;
i.e., less than one year.
G.I. deaths in Nam = 58,000+
In 1965 636 KIA
in 1966 6644 KIA
and by the end of 1967 16,021 KIA
Hell before they left in 1970 the First Cav had more than 30.000
Killed or wounded and that was just one Division.

and some idiots around here want to compare Iraq to Vietnam. You can't
compare because of it being a different type of War and tactics. Iraq
is far less intense than Vietnam was.
Bill
2004-02-17 02:27:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Perry
In 1965 636 KIA
in 1966 6644 KIA
and by the end of 1967 16,021 KIA
Hell before they left in 1970 the First Cav had more than 30.000
Killed or wounded and that was just one Division.
and some idiots around here want to compare Iraq to Vietnam. You can't
compare because of it being a different type of War and tactics. Iraq
is far less intense than Vietnam was.
Sounds like Viet Nam '65 to me. Let's stop it from becoming Viet Nam '66
and '67.
Kerry Wants to TAX Hell Out of Us ALL
2004-02-17 08:58:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Nam '66 and '67
Democrat LBJ was then micro-managing the war he promised not to escalate
in his '64 campaign but did anyway because his wife Lady Byrd had big
time rubber investments in Vietnam.

This is where the Dems get their paranoia of Cheney and Halliburton;
they expect Repubs to be as crooked as they are.

Here's what's happening for grassroot members of the Democrat Party:

http://www.f16viper.org/eject.mpg

IOW, they're bailing out as the Party crashes and burns.

The Red Flag of the Clinton-run socialist Democrat Party has faded in
the 21st century sun to surrender monkey white.

Rodham-Clinton legacy:

2002 - Clinton Admits: "I Refused Bin Laden Extradition Offer" - Audio:

http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919

1993 - Clinton controls White House while Democrats control Senate,
House, state legislatures, governorships.

2004 - Republicans own all that.

Why?

Clinton lies and scandals.

1998 - Just another distraction from Tail-Gate(?):

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html

2003 - from Clinton:

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp

What happened to the strong on national defense, space pioneering,
physical fitness advocating, middle class tax cutting Democratic Party
of JFK?
Silentotto
2004-02-17 16:32:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kerry Wants to TAX Hell Out of Us ALL
Nam '66 and '67
Democrat LBJ was then micro-managing the war he promised not to escalate
in his '64 campaign but did anyway because his wife Lady Byrd had big
time rubber investments in Vietnam.
Weren't you one of the morons who, in a flag waving frenzy, tried to
tell me that Viet Nam had noting to do with business interests?
Post by Kerry Wants to TAX Hell Out of Us ALL
This is where the Dems get their paranoia of Cheney and Halliburton;
they expect Repubs to be as crooked as they are.
Haliburton's corporate culture is that of a kleptocracy.

It's not surprising why Cheney was in bed with them.

Birds of a feather...
Post by Kerry Wants to TAX Hell Out of Us ALL
http://www.f16viper.org/eject.mpg
You've got it backwards Cryin' Cowboy.

That's what happening to the Bush administration.

I've never in my life seen the Democrats so unified.

That's all it's going to take to whip Bush.

Even the people who don't like the social agenda of the Democratic
party are still going to vote Democrat because they hate Bush's
obvious pandering to corporate interests and his lies about Iraq.
Post by Kerry Wants to TAX Hell Out of Us ALL
IOW, they're bailing out as the Party crashes and burns.
You've evidence of this besides your forlorn hope that something will
happen to yank Bush's nuts out of the fire?

I mean, now that the sex scandal that you had your hopes pinned on has
fizzled?

The Bush administration deliberately mis-led the American people about
Iraq...

And everyone knows it...

Including you, your propaganda to the contrary not withstanding.

Assholes like you don't care, but enough of the rest of us do that
we're going to send Bush, Ashcroft, Cheney, Wolfawitz and the rest of
the fascists, liars and crooks he installed in Washington goose
stepping back to Texas come November.

And...

The best part is...

There isn't a damn thing that you, Rush, Savage, Hannity, Fox, or any
of the other assholes you listen to can do to stop it.

Bawhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaaaa....

You best get your cryin' towel out now 'cuz you're gonna need it to
wipe your eyes when you're driving your truck around.



=======================

Greed is all right, by the way. I think greed is healthy. You can be
greedy and still feel good about yourself. --- Ivan Boesky


A Satanist will not hesitate to admit to being self-centered, selfish
and hard and will tell you that you too, have all these qualities in
abundance. Satanism is a wholly self-centered philosophy. --- Anton
Levey
Yellow Dog Liberal Biased Journalist
2004-02-17 18:14:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Silentotto
SillyAuntOtto
a.k.a. "Michigan Grand Theft Otto"
Weren't you one of the morons who,
in a flag waving frenzy, tried to tell me that
Vietnam had nothing to do with business
interests?
No, Cornbread, you must have me confused with

one of your

fucktarded

ill Liberal

Red Diaper Doper Baby

Carl Levin suck dick

Neo-Commie

butt buddies.
Post by Silentotto
Weren't you one of the morons who,
in a flag waving frenzy, tried to tell me that
Vietnam had nothing to do with business
interests?
No, Buckwheat, you're the moron who, in an anti-American panic,
contended that "Superbird" LBJ, a U.S. military micro-managing and
therefore bumbling Liberal Democrat Commander-in-Chief, always had the
_purest_ of motives, even when "Beagle Ears" LBJ and his stooge "Boss"
Daley, Sr helped JFK steal the 1960 election from Nixon, even when "My
Fellow Muricans" LBJ campaigned in '64 under the platform of pulling out
of Indochina but did exactly the opposite once elected back in "orifice"
by manufacturing the Gulf of Tonkin incident and lying about it and then
escalating the Holy Hell out of the Vietnam war and made it the quagmire
that it became just to make his frigid bitch wife Ladybird, who had big
time rubber investments throughout Indochina, richer still. No wonder
that the DemonRAT bastards are paranoid of Bush #43 and charging him
with lying about Saddam's Iraqi 2003 WMD. That's the present day
Cretincrats projecting their own "debating" (heh-heh) technique,
projecting their own chicken shit brainless ostrich asshole persona, and
projecting their own cravenly corrupt and venal and communist-oriented
dirty underhanded political tactics.
Post by Silentotto
Weren't you one of the morons who,
in a flag waving frenzy, tried to tell me that
Vietnam had nothing to do with business
interests?
No, Ned Beatty's movie **DELIVERANCE** boy, you dumbassed STFU (Shut The
Fuck Up)-type Dizzycrat, who the Hell would be stupid enough to try to
get anything through your thick bone-headed skull without using an armor
piercing round?
Post by Silentotto
Weren't you one of the [LBJ apologists] who,
in a [wealth re-distributing] frenzy, tried to tell
me that Vietnam had nothing to do with
business interests?
There, Clem, I fixed it for you, you Neo-Commie cunt.
Richard Rongstad
2004-02-17 18:37:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Yellow Dog Liberal Biased Journalist
Post by Silentotto
SillyAuntOtto
a.k.a. "Michigan Grand Theft Otto"
[snip]
Post by Yellow Dog Liberal Biased Journalist
Post by Silentotto
Weren't you one of the morons who,
in a flag waving frenzy, tried to tell me that
Vietnam had nothing to do with business
interests?
No, Ned Beatty's movie **DELIVERANCE** boy, you dumbassed STFU (Shut The
Fuck Up)-type Dizzycrat, who the Hell would be stupid enough to try to
get anything through your thick bone-headed skull without using an armor
piercing round?
There, Clem, I fixed it for you, you Neo-Commie cunt.
Yellow Dog, you sure do have a way with words.
Yellow Dog Liberal Biased Journalist
2004-02-18 01:59:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Rongstad
way with words
Been buttin' heads with this ill-liberal douche bag who wants to give
the UN all of America's military might and calls himself "SilentAuto"
but unfortunately doesn't live up to his oh-so p.c. name for a couple of
years now. Don't mind us none, ya hear...

Crockett "Cowboy" Davies
Ted Gittinger
2004-02-18 01:27:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Anybody know offhand how many names the "Block Sender" function will hold?

ted
Post by Yellow Dog Liberal Biased Journalist
Post by Silentotto
SillyAuntOtto
a.k.a. "Michigan Grand Theft Otto"
Weren't you one of the morons who,
in a flag waving frenzy, tried to tell me that
Vietnam had nothing to do with business
interests?
No, Cornbread, you must have me confused with
one of your
fucktarded
ill Liberal
Red Diaper Doper Baby
Carl Levin suck dick
Neo-Commie
butt buddies.
Post by Silentotto
Weren't you one of the morons who,
in a flag waving frenzy, tried to tell me that
Vietnam had nothing to do with business
interests?
No, Buckwheat, you're the moron who, in an anti-American panic,
contended that "Superbird" LBJ, a U.S. military micro-managing and
therefore bumbling Liberal Democrat Commander-in-Chief, always had the
_purest_ of motives, even when "Beagle Ears" LBJ and his stooge "Boss"
Daley, Sr helped JFK steal the 1960 election from Nixon, even when "My
Fellow Muricans" LBJ campaigned in '64 under the platform of pulling out
of Indochina but did exactly the opposite once elected back in "orifice"
by manufacturing the Gulf of Tonkin incident and lying about it and then
escalating the Holy Hell out of the Vietnam war and made it the quagmire
that it became just to make his frigid bitch wife Ladybird, who had big
time rubber investments throughout Indochina, richer still. No wonder
that the DemonRAT bastards are paranoid of Bush #43 and charging him
with lying about Saddam's Iraqi 2003 WMD. That's the present day
Cretincrats projecting their own "debating" (heh-heh) technique,
projecting their own chicken shit brainless ostrich asshole persona, and
projecting their own cravenly corrupt and venal and communist-oriented
dirty underhanded political tactics.
Post by Silentotto
Weren't you one of the morons who,
in a flag waving frenzy, tried to tell me that
Vietnam had nothing to do with business
interests?
No, Ned Beatty's movie **DELIVERANCE** boy, you dumbassed STFU (Shut The
Fuck Up)-type Dizzycrat, who the Hell would be stupid enough to try to
get anything through your thick bone-headed skull without using an armor
piercing round?
Post by Silentotto
Weren't you one of the [LBJ apologists] who,
in a [wealth re-distributing] frenzy, tried to tell
me that Vietnam had nothing to do with
business interests?
There, Clem, I fixed it for you, you Neo-Commie cunt.
Don T
2004-02-18 01:57:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted Gittinger
Anybody know offhand how many names the "Block Sender" function will hold?
ted
ROTFLMAO.

How big is your hard-drive? That silencer will hold beau coup. I haven't
reached its limit yet. A tip though. Create a "rule" like this:
*!*@webtv.net for "where the from line contains people" then for the action
select "delete it", and you will kill all the web tv senders en mass. You
can do the same for any other domain would you like to block from your
screen.
--
Don Thompson

"The only stupid questions are those that should have been asked, but
weren't, or those that have been asked and answered over and over, but the
answers not listened to." Peter Rowe
Ted Gittinger
2004-02-18 03:41:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Don T
Post by Ted Gittinger
Anybody know offhand how many names the "Block Sender" function will hold?
ted
ROTFLMAO.
How big is your hard-drive?
Geez. For an instant I thought you asked "How big is your hard-on?"

I started to answer that I didn't know; I'd have to look for the tweezers
first. Sigh. P'arm me while I go cruise the Viagra ads.

ted
Chappaquiddick Bubba de Tammany
2004-02-18 09:11:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Hey, Cornbread!

How many threads does Google indicate that have your name in the header?

Feel famous as Pol Pot, yet?

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Your butt buddy "Turd Gittensquirted" spunked your rectum headed face,
yet?

!ROTFLMAO!

Good Commies practicing that "brotherly love."

You two ought to go out to San Franqueebo and get hitched before the
marriage licenses run out, heh-heh.

===

about Sen. Kerry's "main man" - Teddy Kennedy:

http://www.ytedk.com/chapter5.htm

2002 - Clinton Admits: "I Refused Bin Laden Extradition Offer" - Audio:

http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919

1993 - Clinton controls White House while Democrats control Senate,
House, state legislatures, governorships.

2004 - Republicans own all that. Why? Clinton.

1998 - from the Clinton Administration:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html

2003 - from Clinton:

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp

What happened to the strong on national defense, tax cutting Democratic
Party of JFK?
Silentotto
2004-02-18 18:18:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
***@webtv.net (Chappaquiddick Bubba de Tammany) wrote in message news:<28284-40332C33-***@storefull-3231.bay.webtv.net>...

Choke on this Cryin' Cowboy...

http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story.jsp?sectionid=1258&storyid=916439

Bawhahahhahahahahahahahahah...

Another fucking Republican hypocrite...

Just like you.


Bush 'paid for abortion'
February 18, 2004

PRESIDENT Bush faced an extraordinary claim last night that he once
paid for a girl-friend to have an abortion.

The pro-life president arranged for the procedure in the early 1970s,
according to porn publisher Larry Flynt.

The controversial publisher of Hustler magazine told the New York
Daily News he will make the claims in a book coming out this summer.

'This story has got to come out,' said 61-year-old Flynt. 'There's a
lot of hypocrisy in the White House about this whole abortion issue.
I've talked to the woman's friends.

'I've tracked down the doctor who did the abortion, I tracked down the
Bush people who arranged for the abortion I got the story nailed.'

But Flynt would not disclose if he plans to name the woman.

The allegation comes after pop star Moby raised Republican hackles
last week when he told a New York gossip columnist that he thought
Bush's enemies should cause some political mischief. He said: 'For
example, you can go on all the pro-life chatrooms and say you're an
outraged right-wing voter and that you know that George Bush drove an
ex-girlfriend to an abortion clinic and paid for her to get an
abortion.'

There was no hint that 38-year-old Moby believed his abortion
suggestion.

The White House had no immediate comment on the claim.

Republican National Committee spokesman Yier Shi said: 'The Democrats
will do anything in this election, judging by their campaign tactics,
to smear without any evidence or background. This is just another one
of those cases.'

The abortion claim is the first hint of serious scandal that has
emerged to harm the president's re-election chances.

Having won his party's support and the endorsement of family and
conservative groups with his strong pro-life stance, it is certain to
come under close scrutiny as the election in November draws closer.


I wonder why God didn't mention this to Pat Robertson...

I guess he doesn't care about abortions...

This won't go away like the lame scandal Druge's Sludge report tried
to hand on Kerry.

Keep that hankerchief handy Cryin' Cowboy.

You can give it double duty using it to wave bye-bye to Bush and
wiping away your tears at the same time.

You can rage...

You can foam at the mouth.

You can tell lie on top of lie.

But you can't stop people like me from sending Bush back to Texas come
November.




=======================

Greed is all right, by the way. I think greed is healthy. You can be
greedy and still feel good about yourself. --- Ivan Boesky


A Satanist will not hesitate to admit to being self-centered, selfish
and hard and will tell you that you too, have all these qualities in
abundance. Satanism is a wholly self-centered philosophy. --- Anton
Levey
COL RSJ
2004-02-19 04:25:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Who gives a fuck. The lady that caused roe v wade is now agianst
abortion and prolife. Some of us do grow up when we get older, the
rest stay democrats.
Post by Silentotto
Choke on this Cryin' Cowboy...
http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story.jsp?sectionid=1258&storyid=916439
Bawhahahhahahahahahahahahah...
Another fucking Republican hypocrite...
Just like you.
Bush 'paid for abortion'
February 18, 2004
PRESIDENT Bush faced an extraordinary claim last night that he once
paid for a girl-friend to have an abortion.
The pro-life president arranged for the procedure in the early 1970s,
according to porn publisher Larry Flynt.
The controversial publisher of Hustler magazine told the New York
Daily News he will make the claims in a book coming out this summer.
'This story has got to come out,' said 61-year-old Flynt. 'There's a
lot of hypocrisy in the White House about this whole abortion issue.
I've talked to the woman's friends.
'I've tracked down the doctor who did the abortion, I tracked down the
Bush people who arranged for the abortion I got the story nailed.'
But Flynt would not disclose if he plans to name the woman.
The allegation comes after pop star Moby raised Republican hackles
last week when he told a New York gossip columnist that he thought
Bush's enemies should cause some political mischief. He said: 'For
example, you can go on all the pro-life chatrooms and say you're an
outraged right-wing voter and that you know that George Bush drove an
ex-girlfriend to an abortion clinic and paid for her to get an
abortion.'
There was no hint that 38-year-old Moby believed his abortion
suggestion.
The White House had no immediate comment on the claim.
Republican National Committee spokesman Yier Shi said: 'The Democrats
will do anything in this election, judging by their campaign tactics,
to smear without any evidence or background. This is just another one
of those cases.'
The abortion claim is the first hint of serious scandal that has
emerged to harm the president's re-election chances.
Having won his party's support and the endorsement of family and
conservative groups with his strong pro-life stance, it is certain to
come under close scrutiny as the election in November draws closer.
I wonder why God didn't mention this to Pat Robertson...
I guess he doesn't care about abortions...
This won't go away like the lame scandal Druge's Sludge report tried
to hand on Kerry.
Keep that hankerchief handy Cryin' Cowboy.
You can give it double duty using it to wave bye-bye to Bush and
wiping away your tears at the same time.
You can rage...
You can foam at the mouth.
You can tell lie on top of lie.
But you can't stop people like me from sending Bush back to Texas come
November.
=======================
Greed is all right, by the way. I think greed is healthy. You can be
greedy and still feel good about yourself. --- Ivan Boesky
A Satanist will not hesitate to admit to being self-centered, selfish
and hard and will tell you that you too, have all these qualities in
abundance. Satanism is a wholly self-centered philosophy. --- Anton
Levey
--

"Conan, what is best in life?''

''To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.''
Chappaquiddick Kennedy
2004-02-19 07:02:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ken
lies and cursing
http://www.ytedk.com/chapter5.htm
Terrorist Appeaser Draft Dodger Bubba
2004-02-19 13:44:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ken
lies and cursing
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp

http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Silentotto
2004-02-19 20:13:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kerry Wants to TAX Hell Out of Us ALL
Post by Ken
lies and cursing
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp
http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Bush lied.

I know it.

You know it.

We all know it.

He claimed we had certain intelligence concerning WMD and we didn't.

That's called a lie.

End of story.

It doesn't matter what he or Clinton believed.

All the links in the world won't change that fact.

Wave a tearful farwell to your hero Cryin' Cowboy...

He's going back to Texas soon and there will be a democrat in the Whitehouse.

And, there isn't a damn thing you can do to stop it.

Hahahhahahahahaa...

My sides hurt from laughing at you...
Ken
2004-02-19 20:43:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Silentotto
Post by Kerry Wants to TAX Hell Out of Us ALL
Post by Ken
lies and cursing
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp
http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Bush lied.
I know it.
You know it.
We all know it.
He claimed we had certain intelligence concerning WMD and we didn't.
Hope this helps you see things clearly.

June 2003
Kerry Said It Would Be Irresponsible To Draw Conclusions That Suggest
President Misled On WMD. ABC’S GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: I know you said
you’re agnostic about whether or not he misled the public on weapons
of mass destruction. But do you have a hunch on whether you think they
hyped the intelligence?KERRY: George, again, I think it would be
irresponsible of me at this point to draw conclusions prior to all the
evidence being on the table.(ABC’s This Week,6/15/03)

March 2003
As War Began, Kerry Said Saddam Chose To Make Military Force The
Ultimate Weapons Inspections Enforcement Mechanism. Senator John F.
Kerry had lambasted Bush’s diplomatic efforts, despite voting last
fall in support of a congressional resolution authorizing military
action to disarm Iraq of any weapons of mass destruction. ‘It appears
that with the deadline for exile come and gone, Saddam Hussein has
chosen to make military force the ultimate weapons inspections
enforcement mechanism,’ Kerry said. (Glen Johnson, Critics Of Bush
Voice Support For The Troops, The Boston Globe, 3/20/03)

Kerry Said Saddam Hussein’s WMD Are A Threat.I think Saddam Hussein’s
weapons of mass destruction are a threat, and that’s why I voted to
hold him accountable and to make certain that we disarm him. I think
we need to (NPR’s All Things Considered, 3/19/03)

February 2003
Kerry Said Leaving Saddam Hussein Unfettered With Nuclear Weapons Or
Weapons Of Mass Destruction Is Unacceptable. (Jill Lawrence, War Issue
Challenges Democratic Candidates, USA Today, 2/12/03)

Kerry Described Secretary Of State Colin Powell’s Evidence Of WMD In
Iraq As Real And Compelling.[Kerry] said the Bush administration has
taken too long to make its case for military action, ‘but nonetheless
I am glad we’ve reached this moment in our diplomacy.’ Kerry added:
‘Convincing evidence of Saddam Hussein’s possession of weapons of mass
destruction should trigger, I believe, a final ultimatum from the
United Nations for a full, complete, immediate disarmament of those
weapons by Iraq. Over the next hours, I will work with my colleagues
in the Senate to fully examine the evidence offered by the secretary
for a complete and close reading. But, on its face, the evidence
against Saddam Hussein appears real and compelling. (Wayne Washington,
Kennedy, Others Question Timing Of Attack But Presidential Hopefuls
Back War With Iraq, The Boston Globe, 2/6/03)

January 2003
Kerry Said, If You Don’t Believe Saddam Hussein Is A Threat With
Nuclear Weapons, Then You Shouldn’t Vote For Me. (Ronald Brownstein,
On Iraq, Kerry Appears Either Torn Or Shrewd, Los Angeles Times,
1/31/03)

Kerry Described Threat Of Saddam Hussein With WMD As Real, But Not
New. [W]e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous
dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his
offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so
consistently prone to miscalculation. He miscalculated an eight-year
war with Iran. He miscalculated the invasion of Kuwait. He
miscalculated America’s response to that act of naked aggression. He
miscalculated the result of setting oil rigs on fire. He miscalculated
the impact of sending scuds into Israel and trying to assassinate an
American President. He miscalculated his own military strength. He
miscalculated the Arab world’s response to his misconduct. And now he
is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his
consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the
world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with
one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and
disarm. (Sen. John Kerry, Remarks At Georgetown University,
Washington, DC, 1/23/03)

October 2002
Mr. Kerry Said Iraq’s Weapons Of Mass Destruction Posed ‘A Real And
Grave Threat’ To The United States. (Dave Boyer, Key Senators Of Both
Parties Back Bush On Iraq War, The Washington Times, 10/10/02)

Kerry Questioned Saddam’s Actions With Respect To His WMD Capability.
Why is Saddam Hussein pursuing weapons that most nations have agreed
to limit or give up? Why is Saddam Hussein guilty of breaking his own
cease-fire agreement with the international community? Why is Saddam
Hussein attempting to develop nuclear weapons when most nations don’t
even try, and responsible nations that have them attempt to limit
their potential for disaster? Why did Saddam Hussein threaten and
provoke? Why does he develop missiles that exceed allowable limits?
Why did Saddam Hussein lie and deceive the inspection teams
previously? Why did Saddam Hussein not account for all of the weapons
of mass destruction which UNSCOM identified? Why is he seeking to
develop unmanned airborne vehicles for delivery of biological agents?
Does he do all of these things because he wants to live by
international standards of behavior? Because he respects international
law? Because he is a nice guy underneath it all and the world should
trust him? (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/9/02, p. S10171)

Kerry Called It Naive To The Point Of Grave Danger To Leave Saddam To
His Own Devices.It would be naive to the point of grave danger not to
believe that, left to his own devices, Saddam Hussein will provoke,
misjudge, or stumble into a future, more dangerous confrontation with
the civilized world. (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/9/02,
p. S10171)

Kerry Said Threat Of Saddam Hussein With Weapons Of Mass Destruction
Is Real.The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction
is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the
end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after
Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has
continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years
to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the
interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and
the issue of proliferation. (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record,
10/9/02, p. S10171)

Kerry: I Am Prepared To Hold Saddam Hussein Accountable And Destroy
His Weapons Of Mass Destruction. (Ronald Brownstein, Democratic
Presidential Hopefuls Differ On War In Iraq, Los Angeles Times,
10/6/02)

September 2000
Kerry Said There Is Nothing More Destabilizing Or Threatening [To The
World] Than Weapons Of Mass Destruction.I think all of us are deeply
concerned about the degree to which certain countries seem to be
contributing to the potential of instability in the world. Obviously,
there is nothing more destabilizing or threatening than weapons of
mass destruction. We have spent an enormous amount of time and energy
focused on Iraq, on Iran, on Russia, on loose nukes, on nuclear
materials, and of course on China and on the issue of the transfer of
technology to Pakistan. (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record,
9/11/00, p. S8321)

December 1998
Kerry Defended Clinton’s 1998 Attacks Because Saddam Is Pursuing
Weapons Of Mass Destruction.Americans need to really understand the
gravity and legitimacy of what is happening with Saddam Hussein. He
has been given every opportunity in the world to comply. The president
does not control the schedule of UNSCOM. The president did not
withdraw the UNSCOM inspectors. And the president did not, obviously,
cut a deal with Saddam Hussein to do this at this moment. Saddam
Hussein has not complied. Saddam Hussein is pursuing a program to
build weapons of mass destruction.(Sen. John Kerry, Press Conference,
12/16/98)

September 1998
Kerry Said, ‘We’re Going To Have To Make Some Fundamental Decisions
About Whether To Follow A Policy Of Containment Or Deprive Iraq Of Its
Weapons Of Mass Destruction. (Eric Schmitt, U.N. Arms Inspector Who
Quit Is Told He Can’t Make Policy, The New York Times, 9/4/98)

February 1998
Kerry Said Saddam Had Already Used WMD And Had Intent To Do So Again.
[T]here are set of principles here that are very large, larger in some
measure than I think has been adequately conveyed, both
internationally and certainly to the American people. Saddam Hussein
has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the
intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to
continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle
East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist
activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but
not exactly in the Middle East. (Sen. John Kerry, Press Conference,
2/23/98)

Kerry Said That If Saddam’s Weapon Capability Was Not Eliminated We
Will Be Called On To Send Our Ships And Our Troops At One Point In The
Future Back To The Middle East.Saddam Hussein has violated that
standard [against using weapons of mass destruction] on several
occasions previously and by most people's expectation, no matter what
agreement we come up with, may well do so again. The greater
likelihood is that we will be called on to send our ships and our
troops at one point in the future back to the Middle East to stand up
to the next crisis.(Sen. John Kerry, Press Conference, 2/23/98)

December 1997
Kerry Urged U.N. To Eliminate Iraq’s Suspected Infrastructure For
Developing And Manufacturing Weapons Of Mass Destruction.Democratic
Senator John Kerry has said: ‘The Security Council should authorize a
strong UN military response that will materially damage, if not
totally destroy, as much as possible of the suspected infrastructure
for developing and manufacturing weapons of mass destruction.’ He
added that ‘Saddam Hussein has intentionally or inadvertently set up a
test which the entire world will be watching, and if he gets away with
this arrogant ploy, he will have terminated the most important
multilateral effort to defuse a legitimate threat to global security.
(US Lawmakers Threaten Military Action Against Iraq, Agence France
Presse, 12/12/97)

November 1997
Kerry Warned U.S. Senate Of Saddam’s WMD Capabilities. It is not
possible to overstate the ominous implications for the Middle East if
Saddam were to develop and successfully militarize and deploy potent
biological weapons. We can all imagine the consequences. Extremely
small quantities of several known biological weapons have the
capability to exterminate the entire population of cities the size of
Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. These could be delivered by ballistic missile,
but they also could be delivered by much more pedestrian means;
aerosol applicators on commercial trucks easily could suffice. If
Saddam were to develop and then deploy usable atomic weapons, the same
holds true. (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 11/9/97, pp.
S12254 -S12255)

January 1991
Kerry Acknowledged Saddam Working Toward Development Of WMD For
Years.If we go to war in the next few days, it will not be because our
immediate vital interests are so threatened and we have no other
choice. It is not because of nuclear, chemical, biological weapons
when, after all, Saddam Hussein had all those abilities or was working
toward them for years .... (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record,
1/12/91, p. S369)

October 1990
Kerry Said Iraq Has Developed A Chemical Weapons Capability.Today, we
are confronted by a regional power, Iraq, which has attacked a weaker
state, Kuwait. ... The crisis is even more threatening by virtue of
the fact that Iraq has developed a chemical weapons capability, and is
pursuing a nuclear weapons development program. And Saddam Hussein has
demonstrated a willingness to use such weapons of mass destruction in
the past, whether in his war against Iran or against his own Kurdish
population.(Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/2/90, p. S14330)

Ken
11Bravo
Hows Your Father
2004-02-19 23:45:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
W.M.D., the Real Danger --

For a dozen years, world leaders, the United Nations, and leading
Democrats as well as the Bush Administration believed that the largely
satellite-gathered intelligence concerning Iraqi W.M.D. under Saddam's
regime was accurate.

Indeed, many in high or the highest places in various respectable
governments around the globe including our best Allies, the British,
still insist that the hunt for bio-chem weapons of mass destruction in
Iraq is far from complete, that the Kay Report itself may actually be
lacking in totality.

The search for stockpiles of W.M.D. in post-war Iraq continues to this
day.

If the intelligence *is* altogether faulty with this crucial issue, then
the reasonable but extremely tough question should be:

How do we fix the intelligence apparatus for our national defense and
future security...?

...Other than the obvious remedy of our beefing up of ground-based
human intelligence gathering which has been mercilessly torn asunder by
Congresses and Administrations since the late Senator Frank Church
(D-ID) began his vendetta against it long, long ago, that is?

If the intelligence *was* initially correct but the W.M.D. was moved
just prior to and/or during the "coalition of the willing's" invasion of
Saddam's Iraq on March 19, 2003, then the question should be:

To where was the bio-chem W.M.D. dispersed, and more importantly, who
has it now?

Playing snap shot-oriented partisan politics with these vital questions
which determine the safety and direction of not only our nation but that
of the entire planet is sheer suicide -- most assuredly for the
political Party involved, and perhaps, unfortunately, also for mankind.

The world at large is still ignorant of what bio-chem weaponry, unlike
nuclear re Hiroshima and Nagasaki, can inflict; deadly sarin gas
released years ago in a Japanese subway tunnel and post-9/11/2001
anthrax mail "scares" (shots across the bow?) undoubtedly reveal just
the tiny tip of the proverbial mammoth iceberg.

Our collective future education of the potentiality of this type of
disaster might soon come at a far, far higher price than any single sane
person would ever wish to pay.

Remember former President Clinton's Secretary of Defense Cohen's famous
tele-mercial with the 5 pound bag of sugar used as his prop?

It was no joke then, and really a "conservative" estimate.

Now, it has become a living nightmare for those who understand the
potential Hell of modern bio warfare.

Moreover, death by ground zero nuclear holocaust or resultant fallout
would be merciful compared to that caused by some of these incredibly
potent and hideous "living" poisons which are super-modified,
super-refined extracts of the deadliest diseases ever known.

Once that genie is unleashed, the figurative bottle from which it came
will likely dissolve -- like confection sugar in molten lava.

As man's ability to destroy his fellow man increases exponentially with
the passing of time and the subsequent technological advances in such
endeavors, the chem -- and especially the bio bacterial and, worse, the
viral permanently DNA-altering "genetic" weaponry surpasses the nuclear
threat in a way that precious few can even imagine.

In this case, ignorance is bliss for many who are either so uninformed
or so willingly short-sighted. But the ignorance here is no less
deadly.

May God have mercy on us all.

=====

"C.D."

===

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls.html
Hows your father?
Is he Carl Levin?

Do you "play" under his desk

while he "works" at it?

=========

Crockett "Cowboy" Davies
Silentotto
2004-02-20 03:20:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ken
Post by Silentotto
Post by Kerry Wants to TAX Hell Out of Us ALL
Post by Ken
lies and cursing
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp
http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Bush lied.
I know it.
You know it.
We all know it.
He claimed we had certain intelligence concerning WMD and we didn't.
Hope this helps you see things clearly.
Kerry is free to come to his own conclusions, just as I'm free to come
to mine.

Unlike you and your fellow Republicans, I can think for myself, and if
I come to a different conclusion than Kerry does, so be it.

I don't have to worry about getting tossed out of the party because
I'm not marching in lock step with the leadership, unlike certain
other political parties.

It's becoming increasingly clear to me that the evidence for Saddam's
WMD was deliberately overstated by the Bush administration.

When Tennant gave his speech at Georgetown a couple weeks ago, his
carefully chosen and nuanced wording all but confirmed that the CIA
wasn't responsible for providing the necessary evidence to prompt Bush
administration officials to make the pronouncements of utter certainty
that they did.

They may well have believed that Saddam had WMD's.

Lot's of people believed that Saddam had WMD.

But, Bush said he had proof.

He and his adminsitration officals said that they knew Saddam had WMD
with absolute certainty.

They even said that they knew were they were at.

They didn't have such proof and, it's becoming increasing clear that
the CIA didn't provide them with any information that would lead them
to believe that we did have such proof.

Yet, Bush led the American people to believe that the CIA had provided
such information.

That's call a lie.

You and your fellow Republicans keep getting confused about what is
believed and what is proven.

Had Bush and his administration officals said; "We believe Saddam has
WMD."...

If they had said; "We've strong evidence that he has WMD."...

Then we wouldn't be having this discussion.

But that's not what Bush or his officals said, is it?

Perhaps you should carefully listen to Tennant's speech again, and pay
careful attention to how carefully he chooses his words, and how
careful he was not to accept any of the blame for the statements that
were being made by the likes of Rumsfeld, Wolfawitz, Cheney and even
the President himself.

He left little doubt that when it hit's the fan he's not planning on
playing the fall guy.

I know you and your fellow Republians don't like the fact that your
leader is a liar about an issue as serious as national security, war
and the deaths of our soldiers.

But, there it is.
Post by Ken
June 2003
Kerry Said It Would Be Irresponsible To Draw Conclusions That Suggest
President Misled On WMD. ABC?S GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: I know you said
you?re agnostic about whether or not he misled the public on weapons
of mass destruction. But do you have a hunch on whether you think they
hyped the intelligence?KERRY: George, again, I think it would be
irresponsible of me at this point to draw conclusions prior to all the
evidence being on the table.(ABC?s This Week,6/15/03)
March 2003
As War Began, Kerry Said Saddam Chose To Make Military Force The
Ultimate Weapons Inspections Enforcement Mechanism. Senator John F.
Kerry had lambasted Bush?s diplomatic efforts, despite voting last
fall in support of a congressional resolution authorizing military
action to disarm Iraq of any weapons of mass destruction. ?It appears
that with the deadline for exile come and gone, Saddam Hussein has
chosen to make military force the ultimate weapons inspections
enforcement mechanism,? Kerry said. (Glen Johnson, Critics Of Bush
Voice Support For The Troops, The Boston Globe, 3/20/03)
Kerry Said Saddam Hussein?s WMD Are A Threat.I think Saddam Hussein?s
weapons of mass destruction are a threat, and that?s why I voted to
hold him accountable and to make certain that we disarm him. I think
we need to (NPR?s All Things Considered, 3/19/03)
February 2003
Kerry Said Leaving Saddam Hussein Unfettered With Nuclear Weapons Or
Weapons Of Mass Destruction Is Unacceptable. (Jill Lawrence, War Issue
Challenges Democratic Candidates, USA Today, 2/12/03)
Kerry Described Secretary Of State Colin Powell?s Evidence Of WMD In
Iraq As Real And Compelling.[Kerry] said the Bush administration has
taken too long to make its case for military action, ?but nonetheless
?Convincing evidence of Saddam Hussein?s possession of weapons of mass
destruction should trigger, I believe, a final ultimatum from the
United Nations for a full, complete, immediate disarmament of those
weapons by Iraq. Over the next hours, I will work with my colleagues
in the Senate to fully examine the evidence offered by the secretary
for a complete and close reading. But, on its face, the evidence
against Saddam Hussein appears real and compelling. (Wayne Washington,
Kennedy, Others Question Timing Of Attack But Presidential Hopefuls
Back War With Iraq, The Boston Globe, 2/6/03)
January 2003
Kerry Said, If You Don?t Believe Saddam Hussein Is A Threat With
Nuclear Weapons, Then You Shouldn?t Vote For Me. (Ronald Brownstein,
On Iraq, Kerry Appears Either Torn Or Shrewd, Los Angeles Times,
1/31/03)
Kerry Described Threat Of Saddam Hussein With WMD As Real, But Not
New. [W]e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous
dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his
offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so
consistently prone to miscalculation. He miscalculated an eight-year
war with Iran. He miscalculated the invasion of Kuwait. He
miscalculated America?s response to that act of naked aggression. He
miscalculated the result of setting oil rigs on fire. He miscalculated
the impact of sending scuds into Israel and trying to assassinate an
American President. He miscalculated his own military strength. He
miscalculated the Arab world?s response to his misconduct. And now he
is miscalculating America?s response to his continued deceit and his
consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the
world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with
one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and
disarm. (Sen. John Kerry, Remarks At Georgetown University,
Washington, DC, 1/23/03)
October 2002
Mr. Kerry Said Iraq?s Weapons Of Mass Destruction Posed ?A Real And
Grave Threat? To The United States. (Dave Boyer, Key Senators Of Both
Parties Back Bush On Iraq War, The Washington Times, 10/10/02)
Kerry Questioned Saddam?s Actions With Respect To His WMD Capability.
Why is Saddam Hussein pursuing weapons that most nations have agreed
to limit or give up? Why is Saddam Hussein guilty of breaking his own
cease-fire agreement with the international community? Why is Saddam
Hussein attempting to develop nuclear weapons when most nations don?t
even try, and responsible nations that have them attempt to limit
their potential for disaster? Why did Saddam Hussein threaten and
provoke? Why does he develop missiles that exceed allowable limits?
Why did Saddam Hussein lie and deceive the inspection teams
previously? Why did Saddam Hussein not account for all of the weapons
of mass destruction which UNSCOM identified? Why is he seeking to
develop unmanned airborne vehicles for delivery of biological agents?
Does he do all of these things because he wants to live by
international standards of behavior? Because he respects international
law? Because he is a nice guy underneath it all and the world should
trust him? (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/9/02, p. S10171)
Kerry Called It Naive To The Point Of Grave Danger To Leave Saddam To
His Own Devices.It would be naive to the point of grave danger not to
believe that, left to his own devices, Saddam Hussein will provoke,
misjudge, or stumble into a future, more dangerous confrontation with
the civilized world. (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/9/02,
p. S10171)
Kerry Said Threat Of Saddam Hussein With Weapons Of Mass Destruction
Is Real.The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction
is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the
end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after
Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has
continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years
to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the
interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and
the issue of proliferation. (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record,
10/9/02, p. S10171)
Kerry: I Am Prepared To Hold Saddam Hussein Accountable And Destroy
His Weapons Of Mass Destruction. (Ronald Brownstein, Democratic
Presidential Hopefuls Differ On War In Iraq, Los Angeles Times,
10/6/02)
September 2000
Kerry Said There Is Nothing More Destabilizing Or Threatening [To The
World] Than Weapons Of Mass Destruction.I think all of us are deeply
concerned about the degree to which certain countries seem to be
contributing to the potential of instability in the world. Obviously,
there is nothing more destabilizing or threatening than weapons of
mass destruction. We have spent an enormous amount of time and energy
focused on Iraq, on Iran, on Russia, on loose nukes, on nuclear
materials, and of course on China and on the issue of the transfer of
technology to Pakistan. (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record,
9/11/00, p. S8321)
December 1998
Kerry Defended Clinton?s 1998 Attacks Because Saddam Is Pursuing
Weapons Of Mass Destruction.Americans need to really understand the
gravity and legitimacy of what is happening with Saddam Hussein. He
has been given every opportunity in the world to comply. The president
does not control the schedule of UNSCOM. The president did not
withdraw the UNSCOM inspectors. And the president did not, obviously,
cut a deal with Saddam Hussein to do this at this moment. Saddam
Hussein has not complied. Saddam Hussein is pursuing a program to
build weapons of mass destruction.(Sen. John Kerry, Press Conference,
12/16/98)
September 1998
Kerry Said, ?We?re Going To Have To Make Some Fundamental Decisions
About Whether To Follow A Policy Of Containment Or Deprive Iraq Of Its
Weapons Of Mass Destruction. (Eric Schmitt, U.N. Arms Inspector Who
Quit Is Told He Can?t Make Policy, The New York Times, 9/4/98)
February 1998
Kerry Said Saddam Had Already Used WMD And Had Intent To Do So Again.
[T]here are set of principles here that are very large, larger in some
measure than I think has been adequately conveyed, both
internationally and certainly to the American people. Saddam Hussein
has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the
intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to
continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle
East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist
activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but
not exactly in the Middle East. (Sen. John Kerry, Press Conference,
2/23/98)
Kerry Said That If Saddam?s Weapon Capability Was Not Eliminated We
Will Be Called On To Send Our Ships And Our Troops At One Point In The
Future Back To The Middle East.Saddam Hussein has violated that
standard [against using weapons of mass destruction] on several
occasions previously and by most people's expectation, no matter what
agreement we come up with, may well do so again. The greater
likelihood is that we will be called on to send our ships and our
troops at one point in the future back to the Middle East to stand up
to the next crisis.(Sen. John Kerry, Press Conference, 2/23/98)
December 1997
Kerry Urged U.N. To Eliminate Iraq?s Suspected Infrastructure For
Developing And Manufacturing Weapons Of Mass Destruction.Democratic
Senator John Kerry has said: ?The Security Council should authorize a
strong UN military response that will materially damage, if not
totally destroy, as much as possible of the suspected infrastructure
for developing and manufacturing weapons of mass destruction.? He
added that ?Saddam Hussein has intentionally or inadvertently set up a
test which the entire world will be watching, and if he gets away with
this arrogant ploy, he will have terminated the most important
multilateral effort to defuse a legitimate threat to global security.
(US Lawmakers Threaten Military Action Against Iraq, Agence France
Presse, 12/12/97)
November 1997
Kerry Warned U.S. Senate Of Saddam?s WMD Capabilities. It is not
possible to overstate the ominous implications for the Middle East if
Saddam were to develop and successfully militarize and deploy potent
biological weapons. We can all imagine the consequences. Extremely
small quantities of several known biological weapons have the
capability to exterminate the entire population of cities the size of
Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. These could be delivered by ballistic missile,
but they also could be delivered by much more pedestrian means;
aerosol applicators on commercial trucks easily could suffice. If
Saddam were to develop and then deploy usable atomic weapons, the same
holds true. (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 11/9/97, pp.
S12254 -S12255)
January 1991
Kerry Acknowledged Saddam Working Toward Development Of WMD For
Years.If we go to war in the next few days, it will not be because our
immediate vital interests are so threatened and we have no other
choice. It is not because of nuclear, chemical, biological weapons
when, after all, Saddam Hussein had all those abilities or was working
toward them for years .... (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record,
1/12/91, p. S369)
October 1990
Kerry Said Iraq Has Developed A Chemical Weapons Capability.Today, we
are confronted by a regional power, Iraq, which has attacked a weaker
state, Kuwait. ... The crisis is even more threatening by virtue of
the fact that Iraq has developed a chemical weapons capability, and is
pursuing a nuclear weapons development program. And Saddam Hussein has
demonstrated a willingness to use such weapons of mass destruction in
the past, whether in his war against Iran or against his own Kurdish
population.(Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/2/90, p. S14330)
Ken
11Bravo
Ken
2004-02-20 03:32:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Silentotto
Kerry is free to come to his own conclusions, just as I'm free to come
to mine.
Unlike you and your fellow Republicans, I can think for myself, and if
I come to a different conclusion than Kerry does, so be it.
This my friend , your opening statement has just discredited you and
made the rest of your post irrelevant.
1. I'm not a registered Republican
2. You've basicly told me I'm unable to think for myself.

SCREW YOU


FLUSH

Now you're irrelevant too.


Ken
11Bravo
Silentotto
2004-02-20 12:34:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ken
Post by Silentotto
Kerry is free to come to his own conclusions, just as I'm free to come
to mine.
Unlike you and your fellow Republicans, I can think for myself, and if
I come to a different conclusion than Kerry does, so be it.
This my friend , your opening statement has just discredited you and
made the rest of your post irrelevant.
1. I'm not a registered Republican
2. You've basicly told me I'm unable to think for myself.
Yes, that's right.

What was it in your entire post that indicated that you can think for
yourself?

It was nothing but a list of statements concerning what Kerry believed
compiled by rightwingers in an attempt to obscure the issue of Bush's
lies.
Post by Ken
SCREW YOU
You wouldn't like it...

I'd just lay there.
Post by Ken
FLUSH
Now you're irrelevant too.
After reading a few of your posts, I've no interest in discussing
anything with you anyway.

I've already got a rightwing jack in the box to slap around when I get
bored.

Another would be redundent.
Post by Ken
Ken
11Bravo
Ketchup Boy de Fondacrat
2004-02-20 17:50:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
lies
Typical.

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.html

===== ===== ===== ===== =====

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp

http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Ketchup Boy de Fondacrat
2004-02-20 18:22:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ken
lies and cursing
Typical Lib doing what Libs do best-- lying and crying.

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.html

===== ===== ===== ===== =====

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp

http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Ketchup Boy de Fondacrat
2004-02-20 18:03:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
lies
Typical "evil idiot Lib" doing what "evil idiot Libs" do best -- lying
like rugs.

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.html

===== ===== ===== ===== =====

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp

http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Jack G
2004-02-20 23:51:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
"Ketchup Boy de Fondacrat" <***@webtv.net> wrote in message news:6267-40364C0C-***@storefull-3231.bay.webtv.net...
: >>***@hotmail.com
:
: >lies
:
: Typical "evil idiot Lib" doing what "evil idiot Libs" do best -- lying
: like rugs.
:
: http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/
:
: http://www.fakewarriors.com
:
: http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm
:
: http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson
:
: http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.html
:
: ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
:
: http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp
:
: http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919
:
: http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
:
The neo-fascists are beginning to sound a bit shrill, possibly due to the
exposure of their fuhrer Bush as the fraud that many people already
perceived him to be. Great warrior turns out to be draft dodger and
deserter.
Hows Your Father
2004-02-21 00:59:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
draft dodger and deserter
Terms your careless use of which reveal your total lack of military
experience and familiarity.
neo-fascists
No. That's you. And once again, you expose your ignorance. Fascists
are not capitalists. We neo-Conservatives, who left the once proud,
pro-national defense, tax-cutting, space pioneering JFK-styled
Democratic Party when it was hijacked by neo-Commies in the late '60s /
early '70s during the anti-Vietnam War protest "daze," are capitalists.

And you're the 21st century America-hating neo-Stalinists who
fecklessly, recklessly support the Islamo-Fascist terrorists in the
Middle East. Your Hillary Clinton-run, fracturing Socialist-Democrat
Party lost the Y2K general, 2002 midterm, and the 2003 California recall
elections. And that's why you'll also lose on November 2nd, this year
of 2004; you've become ill-Liberal instead of really 'liberal' in the
true traditional sense of the word while the Silent Majority of the
American voting public have tired of all that silly degeneration of
yours.

Still have your crying towels handy from all your losses in the past
11 years? Your disaster in the 1994 Congressional elections should've
taught you something. But it didn't. Neither did Bill Clinton's
impeachment. Why didn't you let Al Gore take the reins in 1998-99? He
could be President now if you had, perhaps.

You Democrats had the White House, Senate, House, state legislatures
and governorships in January of 1993 when the Clintons took office.
Now, the Republicans own all that. You all should really ask yourselves
just why that is. You're in danger of becoming a political party that
is no longer relevant or viable.

You Democrats have no leaders.

Mel Gibson's **THE PASSION** is going to blow you Dems and your
neo-soc, illegal, immoral gay marriage jive right out of the proverbial
water.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls.html
S***@Comcast.net
2004-02-21 15:52:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Hows Your Father
draft dodger and deserter
Terms your careless use of which reveal your total lack of military
experience and familiarity.
One doesn't need military experience to recognize when some rich kid
had daddy pull strings for him so he could screw off in the National
Guard instead of fighting in a war.
Post by Hows Your Father
neo-fascists
No. That's you.
No...

He had it right. You're the one screwing it up.
Post by Hows Your Father
And once again, you expose your ignorance.
I suggest that statement applies more closely to you.
Post by Hows Your Father
Fascists are not capitalists.
What is it with you Neo-Cons and your inability to pick up history
books?

Is it like vampires and garlic or something?

Prominent Nazi supporters like Fritz Thyssen and Albert Vogler, heads
of United Steel Works, weren't capitalists?

Gustav and Alfried Krupp, owners of Germany's largest arms manfacturer
Friedrich Krupp AG in Essen, weren't capitalists?

How about Emil Kirdorp?

Or, Kurt Freiherr Schroeder?

Even the Nazi party and the SS operated as capitalistic organizations.

They were in the process of setting up their own industrial empire,
not state owned, but party owned, on order to secure their own power
base.

Me thinks you've been listening to too much reactionary propaganda. I
smell Savage's evil had at work.

That guy is like Saruman to Bush's Saraun, spewing lies to rouse the
innorant rabble.
Post by Hows Your Father
We neo-Conservatives, who left the once proud,
pro-national defense, tax-cutting, space pioneering JFK-styled
Democratic Party when it was hijacked by neo-Commies in the late '60s /
early '70s during the anti-Vietnam War protest "daze," are capitalists.
Hijacked by "neo-communists"...

More propaganda ala Savage and Limbaugh.

What you really are is a tool of the Military Industrial Complex,
which a great Republican Dwight Eisenhower, warned everyone about in
his farewell speech on January 17, 1961.

"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition
of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the
military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of
misplaced power exists and will persist. "

It looks like Eisenhower's warning is coming to pass.
Post by Hows Your Father
And you're the 21st century America-hating neo-Stalinists who
fecklessly, recklessly support the Islamo-Fascist terrorists in the
Middle East. Your Hillary Clinton-run, fracturing Socialist-Democrat
Party lost the Y2K general, 2002 midterm, and the 2003 California recall
elections. And that's why you'll also lose on November 2nd, this year
of 2004; you've become ill-Liberal instead of really 'liberal' in the
true traditional sense of the word while the Silent Majority of the
American voting public have tired of all that silly degeneration of
yours.
Yep...

Another stupid ignorant Savage listener goose stepping over the cliff
with the rest of the neo-con lemmings.

Can't you guys think up your own rants?

It's like you're all reading from the same page of B.S.

Don't you get invited to the party if you don't goosestep to the
neo-con line?

You're silent majority is a myth.

The majority are very vocal and their clear on their agenda, which is
to send Bush back to Texas come November.

Bush promised to be a unifier, and through his lies and pandering to
big business and the power elite, he has succeeded.

The Democrats have never been so unified before, in the entire history
of the party. They have one over-riding concern. And that is to send
Bush and the fascists, liars and crooks that he installed in
Washington packing.

You, Savage and Limbaugh can rant and rave all you want, but you can't
stop it.
Post by Hows Your Father
Still have your crying towels handy from all your losses in the past
11 years? Your disaster in the 1994 Congressional elections should've
taught you something.
Isn't that the election where Gingrich proclaimed that the presidency
was now irrelevant and that the Republican congress could enact their
agenda inspite of Clinton being in the Whitehouse?

Lol...

As soon as the right wing agenda became known to the American people,
they flocked to Clinton, backing every move he made to block the right
wing agenda and giving him a landslide victory in '96.

When your fellow reich wingers found that you couldn't pass your
agenda though the democratic process, they launched a coup attempt and
when that failed, they stole the 2000 election.

Now we're seeing the fruits of the reich wing victory.

3,000,000 jobs lost. New jobs that pay much less than the one's being
shipped over seas. Tax breaks for the very wealthy while we run
record deficits. Lies to justify the invasion of Iraq and soldiers
being killed in a daily basis. American citizens being held in jail
with out being charged with a crime and without being allowed access
to a lawyer. The Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable
search being stricken from the books...

The list goes on and on.

That's why were voting Bush out in November.
Post by Hows Your Father
But it didn't. Neither did Bill Clinton's
impeachment.
Oh, we learned a lesson from Bill Clinton's impeachment all right.

We learned that there is no limit to the extremes the Republicans and
their corporate backers won't go through in an attempt to seize the
reigns of power.
Post by Hows Your Father
Why didn't you let Al Gore take the reins in 1998-99? He
could be President now if you had, perhaps.
Gore would be president if we had suspected that the Republicans would
stoop so low as to blatantly steal an election and had taken steps to
guard against it.

Lesson learned.
Post by Hows Your Father
You Democrats had the White House, Senate, House, state legislatures
and governorships in January of 1993 when the Clintons took office.
Now, the Republicans own all that. You all should really ask yourselves
just why that is.
We already know.

Right wing Supreme Court supported disenfranchising of voters in
Florida.

Good thing for the Republicans Scalia and Cheney are such good
buddies.
Post by Hows Your Father
You're in danger of becoming a political party that
is no longer relevant or viable.
Bawhahahahahahahahaha...

Yea, right.

You keep telling yourself that.

You can tell it to yourself right up until November for all I care.

People with a liberal bent, people who know Bush lied about Iraq,
people who know that Bush is a tool for big business and the power
elite are all going to vote Democrat.

They don't even care who the nominee is, as long as it isn't Bush.

I've never seen anything like this before.

It's all over but the reich wing crying and screaming about their
loss.

You can start waving bye-bye to Bush right now, because he's got about
10 months left as president before he is nothing but a bad memory.
Post by Hows Your Father
You Democrats have no leaders.
We don't need them to beat Bush.
Post by Hows Your Father
Mel Gibson's **THE PASSION** is going to blow you Dems and your
neo-soc, illegal, immoral gay marriage jive right out of the proverbial
water.
I seriously doubt that Mel addresses the homophobic concerns of reich
wingers like you.
Yellow Dog Liberal Biased Journalist
2004-02-21 19:33:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
The Left-wing typically military-phobic and anti-American Loony
Post by S***@Comcast.net
rich kid
You mean like Teddy Chappaquiddick Kennedy who was busy drowning a
secretary and getting away with it in July of 1969?
Post by S***@Comcast.net
rich kid
You mean like John _Forbes Kerry and Senator's son Bore-Gore the D.N.C.
Whore were during Vietnam?

Gore's rich Tennessee daddy got AL-baby a cushy, fat cat,
behind-the-lines job in Nam as a writer of newspaper articles.

Meanwhile, politically ambitious Kerry and his filthy rich
old-Massachusetts-money maternal Forbes connection got things arranged
for him to return several months early from supposedly "heroic" (3
Band-Aid wounds) combat in Southeast Asia.

So John "F.ing" Kerry could back-stab his G.I. buddies still fighting in
Vietnam by hooking up with Communist-sympathizing Kerry-mentoring
Northeastern American Liberal Democrat politicians, who made sure old
Gigolo Ketchup Boy had plenty of medals for good cover and for good
campaign fodder, by hooking up with Hanoi Jane Fonda, and by hooking up
with the communist-oriented VVAW (Vietnam Veterans Against the War).

Kerry's early '70s anti-Viet Vet lying testimony before Congress will
end up dooming him this election.

Presidential "Candy-Date" Kerry won't get the veteran or military voting
block on November 2nd. Count on it.

Only delusional, military ignorant, "silly-vilian" ill-Liberal Democrats
would imagine so.

It didn't help McGovern to be a bona fide war hero versus Nixon in the
1972 election, did it? It didn't help George Herbert Walker Bush in '92
against Terrorist Appeaser Draft Dodger Bubba, did it? And it surely
didn't help Bob Dole in '96, either, did it?

And here Hilly's Billy KKKlintoon, the JFK-wannabe sleazeball who took
illegal presidential 1996 campaign contributions from Communist Red
Chinese military operatives in exchange for nuclear weaponry secrets, as
we all know, did even worse during his Vietnam "daze" than all of the
above ill-Liberal DemonRATS combined:

===============

All-Blow-and-No-Go Bubba KKKlintoon hooked up with the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics during the Vietnam War to organize anti-war
demonstrations in Europe and the United States. Bill Clinton and John
Hanoi Jane Fonda Ketchup Boy Gigolo Kerry were both working to undermine
the U.S. war effort in Southeast Asia. Now, the two of them along with
their mentor and idol Teddy Chappaquiddick Kennedy are working to
undermine Operation Iraqi Freedom by throwing every bit of mud that they
can at our Commander-in-Chief. A turncoat trio of three muska-traitors
if there ever was one:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a40091.htm

========

Here's how the so-called "mainstream" covers for the Left:

http://www.bennett.com/archives/003459.html

http://www.mediaresearch.org/

http://www.chronwatch.com/editorial/2002-04-03c.asp
Ketchup Boyo du Fondacrat
2004-02-21 23:52:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
< incredible arrogance snipped >
You weren't even alive during the Vietnam Conflict. Yet you think
you're an expert on American involvement there.

You weren't even in the military, don't know anyone in the military, or
have ever had anyone in your family in the military. Yet you think
you're an expert on U.S. military matters overseas.

You haven't read John Forbes Kerry's personal military history or his
anti-Vietnam War testimony before Congress in the early '70s from the
urls I provided the other day. Yet you think you're an expert on the
matter.

All you really have is the word of your University of Michigan sociology
professors who have the same personal military history as yourself --
zip, zero, zilch, nada, nil. That's third hand knowledge at best. Yet
you march in lock step with them under their very faded hammer 'n'
sickle red banner to the far, far Left with their Socialist propaganda
stirring in your hearts but left totally unexamined by your brains.

Which gives you a lot of arrogance to bring to the argument.

But not much else.

I trust in spite of your University of Michigan public so-called
"education" (read: 'indoctrination') you can still read. Once again,
here are the Kerry urls:

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.html

===== ===== ===== ===== =====

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp

http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Ted Chappaquiddick Drunk Lech Kennedy
2004-02-22 00:16:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
< wrote his usual abusive crap in hopes of
getting others to stoop again to his level >
Chill, !Dude! Have a drink on your pal here:

http://www.ytedk.com/chapter5.htm
Dem Sen Robert KKK Wizard Sheets Byrd
2004-02-22 00:32:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
< wrote his usual abusive crap to cover the
fact that he and his fellow
University of Michigan Affirmative Action
embracing Libs are the real condescending
holier-than-thou racists >
As Coward Mad Dog Bad Back Doctor Dean was the real face of the
ultra-Liberal anti-American anti-War on Terror Socialist-DemonRAT Party,

then so is Robert Ku Klux Klan Wizard Sheets Byrd the real face of the
racist anti-self-reliance anti-real-merit pro-quota-based-on-race
Socialist-DemoCRAP Party.

Here, Mr. "Michigan Grand Theft Otto," chew on this:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/907453/posts
S***@Comcast.net
2004-02-22 03:52:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:33:25 -0700 (MST), ***@webtv.net (Yellow
Dog Liberal Biased Journalist) wrote:

Do the world a favor and drop dead Cryin' Cowboy.

Your contributions to the group should be shut down by the EPA as
pollution.

You're an asshole.



=======================

Greed is all right, by the way. I think greed is healthy. You can be
greedy and still feel good about yourself. --- Ivan Boesky


A Satanist will not hesitate to admit to being self-centered, selfish
and hard and will tell you that you too, have all these qualities in
abundance. Satanism is a wholly self-centered philosophy. --- Anton
Levey
Post by Yellow Dog Liberal Biased Journalist
The Left-wing typically military-phobic and anti-American Loony
Post by S***@Comcast.net
rich kid
You mean like Teddy Chappaquiddick Kennedy who was busy drowning a
secretary and getting away with it in July of 1969?
Post by S***@Comcast.net
rich kid
You mean like John _Forbes Kerry and Senator's son Bore-Gore the D.N.C.
Whore were during Vietnam?
Gore's rich Tennessee daddy got AL-baby a cushy, fat cat,
behind-the-lines job in Nam as a writer of newspaper articles.
Meanwhile, politically ambitious Kerry and his filthy rich
old-Massachusetts-money maternal Forbes connection got things arranged
for him to return several months early from supposedly "heroic" (3
Band-Aid wounds) combat in Southeast Asia.
So John "F.ing" Kerry could back-stab his G.I. buddies still fighting in
Vietnam by hooking up with Communist-sympathizing Kerry-mentoring
Northeastern American Liberal Democrat politicians, who made sure old
Gigolo Ketchup Boy had plenty of medals for good cover and for good
campaign fodder, by hooking up with Hanoi Jane Fonda, and by hooking up
with the communist-oriented VVAW (Vietnam Veterans Against the War).
Kerry's early '70s anti-Viet Vet lying testimony before Congress will
end up dooming him this election.
Presidential "Candy-Date" Kerry won't get the veteran or military voting
block on November 2nd. Count on it.
Only delusional, military ignorant, "silly-vilian" ill-Liberal Democrats
would imagine so.
It didn't help McGovern to be a bona fide war hero versus Nixon in the
1972 election, did it? It didn't help George Herbert Walker Bush in '92
against Terrorist Appeaser Draft Dodger Bubba, did it? And it surely
didn't help Bob Dole in '96, either, did it?
And here Hilly's Billy KKKlintoon, the JFK-wannabe sleazeball who took
illegal presidential 1996 campaign contributions from Communist Red
Chinese military operatives in exchange for nuclear weaponry secrets, as
we all know, did even worse during his Vietnam "daze" than all of the
===============
All-Blow-and-No-Go Bubba KKKlintoon hooked up with the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics during the Vietnam War to organize anti-war
demonstrations in Europe and the United States. Bill Clinton and John
Hanoi Jane Fonda Ketchup Boy Gigolo Kerry were both working to undermine
the U.S. war effort in Southeast Asia. Now, the two of them along with
their mentor and idol Teddy Chappaquiddick Kennedy are working to
undermine Operation Iraqi Freedom by throwing every bit of mud that they
can at our Commander-in-Chief. A turncoat trio of three muska-traitors
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a40091.htm
========
http://www.bennett.com/archives/003459.html
http://www.mediaresearch.org/
http://www.chronwatch.com/editorial/2002-04-03c.asp
Otto Pringle
2004-02-22 11:31:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Medals? ALL officers get medals in combat. During the first Gulf war..EVERY
single officer in my friek'n battalion got medals...not the soft kind
either, ones for heroism..even though they never saw squat. How many
enlisted got medals?....ONE! An office pog that did the paperwork for the
officers.
So when an officer 'recalls' his glorious medals from combat...it just makes
me kind'a...puke. NO...not ALL of'em were paper heros...but MOST of'em are.
So you just never know unless you do your homework man.
General Christmas...USMC...THATS a war hero.
--
Gunnery Sergeant
USMC retired
Post by Yellow Dog Liberal Biased Journalist
The Left-wing typically military-phobic and anti-American Loony
Post by S***@Comcast.net
rich kid
You mean like Teddy Chappaquiddick Kennedy who was busy drowning a
secretary and getting away with it in July of 1969?
Post by S***@Comcast.net
rich kid
You mean like John _Forbes Kerry and Senator's son Bore-Gore the D.N.C.
Whore were during Vietnam?
Gore's rich Tennessee daddy got AL-baby a cushy, fat cat,
behind-the-lines job in Nam as a writer of newspaper articles.
Meanwhile, politically ambitious Kerry and his filthy rich
old-Massachusetts-money maternal Forbes connection got things arranged
for him to return several months early from supposedly "heroic" (3
Band-Aid wounds) combat in Southeast Asia.
So John "F.ing" Kerry could back-stab his G.I. buddies still fighting in
Vietnam by hooking up with Communist-sympathizing Kerry-mentoring
Northeastern American Liberal Democrat politicians, who made sure old
Gigolo Ketchup Boy had plenty of medals for good cover and for good
campaign fodder, by hooking up with Hanoi Jane Fonda, and by hooking up
with the communist-oriented VVAW (Vietnam Veterans Against the War).
Kerry's early '70s anti-Viet Vet lying testimony before Congress will
end up dooming him this election.
Presidential "Candy-Date" Kerry won't get the veteran or military voting
block on November 2nd. Count on it.
Only delusional, military ignorant, "silly-vilian" ill-Liberal Democrats
would imagine so.
It didn't help McGovern to be a bona fide war hero versus Nixon in the
1972 election, did it? It didn't help George Herbert Walker Bush in '92
against Terrorist Appeaser Draft Dodger Bubba, did it? And it surely
didn't help Bob Dole in '96, either, did it?
And here Hilly's Billy KKKlintoon, the JFK-wannabe sleazeball who took
illegal presidential 1996 campaign contributions from Communist Red
Chinese military operatives in exchange for nuclear weaponry secrets, as
we all know, did even worse during his Vietnam "daze" than all of the
===============
All-Blow-and-No-Go Bubba KKKlintoon hooked up with the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics during the Vietnam War to organize anti-war
demonstrations in Europe and the United States. Bill Clinton and John
Hanoi Jane Fonda Ketchup Boy Gigolo Kerry were both working to undermine
the U.S. war effort in Southeast Asia. Now, the two of them along with
their mentor and idol Teddy Chappaquiddick Kennedy are working to
undermine Operation Iraqi Freedom by throwing every bit of mud that they
can at our Commander-in-Chief. A turncoat trio of three muska-traitors
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a40091.htm
========
http://www.bennett.com/archives/003459.html
http://www.mediaresearch.org/
http://www.chronwatch.com/editorial/2002-04-03c.asp
Hillarys Coming Reign of Terror
2004-02-22 14:23:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
< Socialism Uber Alles ! >
This your post-Iowa caucuses Coward Dean impression, is it?

Jacked that Flint is hosting this year's CommIntern, are we?

Or did some other Y2K "blue state" out bid you Michigan cheap skates?

===============

All-Blow-and-No-Go Bubba KKKlintoon hooked up with the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics during the Vietnam War to organize anti-war
demonstrations in Europe and the United States. Bill Clinton and John
Hanoi Jane Fonda Ketchup Boy Gigolo Kerry were both working to undermine
the U.S. war effort in Southeast Asia. Now, the two of them along with
their mentor and idol Teddy Chappaquiddick Kennedy are working to
undermine Operation Iraqi Freedom by throwing every bit of mud that they
can at our Commander-in-Chief. A turncoat trio of three muska-traitors
if there ever was one:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a40091.htm

========

Here's how the so-called "mainstream" covers for the Left:

http://www.bennett.com/archives/003459.html

http://www.mediaresearch.org/

http://www.chronwatch.com/editorial/2002-04-03c.asp
Silentotto
2004-02-21 04:18:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Jack G
: >lies
: Typical "evil idiot Lib" doing what "evil idiot Libs" do best -- lying
: like rugs.
: http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/
: http://www.fakewarriors.com
: http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm
: http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson
: http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.html
: ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
: http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp
: http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919
: http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
The neo-fascists are beginning to sound a bit shrill, possibly due to the
exposure of their fuhrer Bush as the fraud that many people already
perceived him to be. Great warrior turns out to be draft dodger and
deserter.
You forgot liar and hypocrite.

The writing on the wall concerning the future of Bush's presidency is
becoming increasingly easy to discern now.

It's got the Cryin' Cowboy and his likes in a panic.

They see their dreams of a closely regimented state operated to the
benifit of a ruling oligarchy going up in smoke.

When I think that the Republicans are going to blow $250,000,000 in a
doomed attempt to get Bush re-elected I could die from laughing.
Hows Your Father
2004-02-21 15:42:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by COL RSJ
Some of us do grow up when we get older,
the rest stay democrats.
This is the best explanation of why Liberal Democrats neurotically act
so helpless. Their self-proclaimed but misnamed label of "progressives"
doesn't fit. Since they're slouching towards a welfare nanny state.
Which has been proven time and again throughout history simply not to
work,

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls.html
S***@Comcast.net
2004-02-21 19:55:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Hows Your Father
Post by COL RSJ
Some of us do grow up when we get older,
the rest stay democrats.
This is the best explanation of why Liberal Democrats neurotically act
so helpless. Their self-proclaimed but misnamed label of "progressives"
doesn't fit. Since they're slouching towards a welfare nanny state.
Which has been proven time and again throughout history simply not to
work,
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls.html
You know what?

Fuck you...

You're an asshole.

You talk about a welfare nanny state and I'm seeing kids who can't
sleep because their teeth are rotting out of their heads and they
can't mow enough lawns to pay a $2,000 dollar dentist bill and their
parents jobs don't have any insurance.

And what are we spending the money on instead?

Star Wars missile defense and tax breaks for Donald Trump and Bill
Gates.

You talk about a welfare nanny state and I see sick, mentally ill
people sleeping on the streets instead of being in a decent, clean
hospital where they can get supervised treatment.

And what are we spending the money on instead?

Paying Exxon because they can't sail the Exxon Valdez in U.S. waters
after they passed the double hulled tanker law.

You talk about a welfare nanny state, and I watched a man, crippled
with cerebral palsy, die a miserable death living in the slum that was
all he could afford. He didn't die right away, he got to suffer and
worry for about 10 years first.

You right wing assholes like nice little platitudes about a welfare
state and how everyone want's to sponge off it, and while your riding
around in your car listening to Savage and Limbaugh, real people are
suffering from real miseries that the only cure for is money.

You're a bunch of greedy, venal, self-serving assholes and I hope you
all die the same sort of miserable death that your so quick to condemn
other so.

You right wing assholes can all fuck off and die as far as I'm
concerned.
Gen
2004-02-22 05:06:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Hows Your Father
Post by COL RSJ
Some of us do grow up when we get older,
the rest stay democrats.
This is the best explanation of why Liberal Democrats neurotically act
so helpless. Their self-proclaimed but misnamed label of "progressives"
doesn't fit. Since they're slouching towards a welfare nanny state.
Which has been proven time and again throughout history simply not to
work,
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls.html
Nanny State Huh? Looks Like Bush Already Took The Cake On That One.



The Nanny in Chief
Bush thinks he knows what's good for you, and he'll spend money to
prove it
By ANDREW SULLIVAN

Monday, Feb. 02, 2004
There's barely a speech by President Bush that doesn't cite the
glories of human freedom. It's God's gift to mankind, he believes. And
in some ways this President has clearly expanded it: the people of
Afghanistan and Iraq enjoy liberties unimaginable only a few years
ago. But there's a strange exception to this Bush doctrine. It ends
when you reach America's shores. Within the U.S., the Bush
Administration has shown an unusually hostile attitude toward the
exercise of personal freedom. When your individual choices conflict
with what the Bush people think is good for you, they have been only
too happy to intervene. The government, Bush clearly believes, has a
right to be involved in many personal decisions you make — punishing
some, encouraging others, nudging and prodding the public to live the
good life as the President understands it. The nanny state, much loved
by Democrats, is thriving under Republicans.

Just recall Bush's State of the Union address last week. People used
to ridicule President Clinton's laundry list of micro-initiatives. But
Bush is no different. Where once education was essentially the
preserve of states, school principals and parents, this President has
expanded the federal role in unprecedented ways. The No Child Left
Behind Act holds states and localities accountable for meeting
educational standards in order to qualify for federal funds. No wonder
Ted Kennedy originally signed on.


In his speech, the President unveiled millions of dollars to randomly
test high school kids for drug use. He is doubling the federal money
currently spent to admonish teens to practice sexual abstinence. He is
spending hundreds of millions of dollars on antidrug propaganda and
sending federal agents to bust pot clubs for those using medical
marijuana to ease the pain of crippling diseases. Republican Senators
are even trying to withhold federal funding from states that allow
medical-marijuana ads on public transport. These are not unrelated
measures. The President is proud of his Big Government moralism. As he
put it in his first State of the Union message, "Values are important,
so we have tripled funding for character education to teach our
children not only reading and writing, but right from wrong." Sounds
inoffensive enough. But who exactly determines what is right and what
is wrong? Churches? Synagogues? Parents? Teachers? Nah. The Federal
Government.

Once upon a time, Republicans believed in leaving it to the private
and voluntary sectors to do the important work of building citizenship
and values. Remember the "thousand points of light"? These days those
lightbulbs need government subsidies. One of the key beliefs of this
President is that federal money should be funneled to religious groups
that blend proselytizing with important social work. His faith-based
initiative largely withered on the vine, but he has done what he can.
In last year's State of the Union message, he proposed almost half a
billion dollars to pay for mentors for disadvantaged high school
students or the children of prisoners. This year he proposed an
extensive government program to coach newly released ex-cons into
better lives. Ever wonder who these government-backed mentors are? And
what exactly they're preaching? Maybe you should, because you're
paying for them.

States' rights? Only if the states do what the President believes in.
How else to explain the vast expansion of federal power that the
Partial Birth Abortion Act entailed, limiting the rights of states to
regulate abortion as they see fit? On medical marijuana, the Bush
doctrine has led to federal agents' overruling state laws that
tolerate the use of pot for medicinal purposes. Gay marriage? The Bush
Administration is close to backing a federal constitutional amendment
that would overrule any state that decided to give marriages — or even
civil unions and domestic partnerships — to gays. States' rights are
all well and good — as long as the states don't do things that some
Republicans disapprove of.

Want to lose weight using ephedra? You can't. Bush's FDA has banned
the over-the-counter supplement. Steroids? You heard the Nanny in
Chief. And if you're a scientist researching a touchy subject, be
prepared to feel the breath of Big Government down the back of your
white coat. Early on in his Administration, the President — not
scientists or patients — decided exactly how far federally funded
research into stem cells could go. Cloning technologies? Forget about
it.

There has always been a tension in conservatism between those who
favor more liberty and those who want more morality. But what's
indisputable is that Bush's "compassionate conservatism" is a move
toward the latter — the use of the government to impose and subsidize
certain morals over others. He is fusing Big Government liberalism
with religious-right moralism. It's the nanny state with more cash.
Your cash, that is. And their morals.
From Hillary With Love
2004-02-22 14:37:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
< whining for his dream,
the welfare-nanny state >
Got all the plans laid for your working man's Socialist Utopia?

Must be difficult since you're no working man.
< but i know what's best for everybody ! >
Do you also squat to pee?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls.html
Silentotto
2004-02-22 20:43:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by From Hillary With Love
< whining for his dream,
the welfare-nanny state >
No.

Just pointing out that when the assholes you like get a chance to run
things, the country goes to hell in a handbasket.

If you had your way, in a hundred years from now people would be in
their history books about the American disaster and shaking their
heads wondering how any leader could be so fucking stupid.

Ayn Rand...

What a stupid, dried up, constipated old cunt...

No wonder you like her.

Too bad you're too stupid to understand how stupid she was.

People have only had four years of Bush and they've had it up to
'here' with his corrupt pandering to corporate interests and trying to
exploit national security interests for political gain.
Post by From Hillary With Love
Got all the plans laid for your working man's Socialist Utopia?
We don't need a socialist utopia.

All we need is to keep greedy corporate interests from hijacking the
country toward their own selfish ends.

You know...

Off shore tax shelters so they can avoid paying their fair share, and
dumping the tax burden on the middle class.

Putting the most productive workers in the world on the street because
it's still cheaper to pay children overseas a dollar a day to make
their products.

Illegal aliens taking jobs 'nobody wants' and subverting the labor
market.

Raiding the treasury every time they get a Republican in office.

You don't like to talk about corporate welfare, eh Cryin' Cowboy?

You don't like to talk about the real suffering that exists in this
country.

All you like to do is regurgitate the horseshit that Savage and
Limbaugh are shoveling.

Why is that?

Too embarrassed that your supporting a political party that is bought
and paid for by multinational corporations who's CEO's are using every
dirty sleazy trick in the book, including launching a war, to pad
their earnings report for the next quarter and get another hundred
million in stock options?

No matter that they blatently steal from their investors.

And you climb right into bed with the scummy sleeze balls, let the
fuck you in the ass and spew on your face in the hope that the
Republicans will pat you on the head and tell you what a good boy you
are and raise your military retirement check.

You represent the worst in American culture.

You're the poster child for the ugly American.

You're a chicken shit liar, a brain dead goose stepping lemming and,
worst of all, a bore.

How many Republicans does it take to fix a burned out light bulb?

None.

Cut taxes and it will fix itself.

Hahahahahaahahah...

You and your ilk are fucking assholes.

You know you're assholes to.

You pride yourself on being an asshole.

You've got to make up quotes to argue against because your too much of
a limp dicked, bent over RNC whore to keep your head above water in a
real debate.

Too bad for you most of the rest of the country don't have much use
for assholes.

Maybe you should get a real life and see how rewarding it can be
instead of trying for a country where they tell you when to eat, sleep
and shit like you've lived your life so far.

Well, too bad for you.

You're gonna have to learn to think for yourself because your dreams
of Ashcrofts police state are going to come to nothing.

Bush is doomed.

He's going down in flames just like is daddy did and there isn't a
damn thing you can do to stop it.

=======================

Greed is all right, by the way. I think greed is healthy. You can be
greedy and still feel good about yourself. --- Ivan Boesky


A Satanist will not hesitate to admit to being self-centered, selfish
and hard and will tell you that you too, have all these qualities in
abundance. Satanism is a wholly self-centered philosophy. --- Anton
Levey
rms1
2004-02-23 17:03:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Silentotto
Just pointing out that when the assholes you like get a chance to run
things, the country goes to hell in a handbasket.
Well, at least some right-wing and censorship-promoting crooks may be going to jail:

http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-bin/news?e=pri&dt=040223&cat=news&st=newscrimerigasdc
Silentotto
2004-02-24 02:39:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by rms1
Post by Silentotto
Just pointing out that when the assholes you like get a chance to run
things, the country goes to hell in a handbasket.
http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-bin/news?e=pri&dt=040223&cat=news&st=newscrimerigasdc
Not enough of them.

Remember the corporate scramble to re-write their books after Enron
collapsed?

This is just the tip of the iceberg.

The Bush administration is putting on a few show trials and then it's
back to business as ususal.
the TAXman is Rich White Male Kerry
2004-02-23 01:23:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
< i'm not all here >
Firing on 3 out of 8 cylinders, are ya, Cornbread?

Juice your useless pompous self up with this, you "looser":

John _Fonda _Forbes _Flip _Flop Kerry, the phony Ketchup Boy Gigolo and
his skeletons in the closet that the Left-wing D.N.C. hacks in the
so-called "mainstream" media don't want you to see:

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.html

===== ===== ===== ===== =====

TAX-Hiker of historic proportions, All-Blow-and-No-Go Bubba KKKlintoon
da Clumsy 'n' Goofy D.N.C. Gangsta's admitted negligence in combating
terror:

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp

http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Silentotto
2004-02-23 15:08:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by the TAXman is Rich White Male Kerry
< i'm not all here >
Another fake quote from a loser government sponge liar...

Surprise, surprise.
Post by the TAXman is Rich White Male Kerry
Firing on 3 out of 8 cylinders, are ya, Cornbread?
Just pointing out more of your lies, Spooge face.

I know you don't like it.

Too bad.

How does it feel to be such an asshole?
Yea, I already knew the sort of web sites you rely on for your
'facts'.

Thanks for confirming where you find your lies.

I knew you weren't smart enough to think up your own lies.
Post by the TAXman is Rich White Male Kerry
John _Fonda _Forbes _Flip _Flop Kerry, the phony Ketchup Boy Gigolo
Is going to send Bush's lying ass right back to Texas come November,
and none of the lies or lying links you post can change that.

Nor will your rants, temper tantrums or all the money supplied by
corporate interests so that they can continue their crime wave.
Post by the TAXman is Rich White Male Kerry
his skeletons in the closet that the Left-wing D.N.C. hacks in the
The only 'skelaton' in Kerry's closet is the one at Skull and Bones.

Somehow I don't think liar Bush will want to dewll on that one.
Post by the TAXman is Rich White Male Kerry
http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/
http://www.fakewarriors.com
http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm
http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson
http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.html
===== ===== ===== ===== =====
TAX-Hiker of historic proportions, All-Blow-and-No-Go Bubba KKKlintoon
da Clumsy 'n' Goofy D.N.C. Gangsta's admitted negligence in combating
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_54281.asp
http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/8/10/230919
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Grand Theft Otto a Yellow Journalist
2004-02-23 17:55:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
< Waa-aa! Ralphie-baby's dickin' up my
Commiecrat Party again by showing
the public who we real are -- neo-Commies! >
Stand naked, there Mr. Fabian Socialist.

Show the world how tiny your balls are, how like dried spaghetti your
shrivelled dick is, how like linguini your spine is, how like donkey
shit your brain is.

To Hell with your Socialist Welfare Nanny State.

You want that Socialist-DemoCRAP? Move to Cuba, you Carl Levin's little
poofy butt boy.

===============

All-Blow-and-No-Go Bubba KKKlintoon hooked up with the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics during the Vietnam War to organize anti-war
demonstrations in Europe and the United States. Bill Clinton and John
Hanoi Jane Fonda Ketchup Boy Gigolo Kerry were both working to undermine
the U.S. war effort in Southeast Asia. Now, the two of them along with
their mentor and idol Teddy Chappaquiddick Kennedy are working to
undermine Operation Iraqi Freedom by throwing every bit of mud that they
can at our Commander-in-Chief. A turncoat trio of three muska-traitors
if there ever was one:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a40091.htm

========

Here's how the so-called "mainstream" media covers for the Left:

http://www.bennett.com/archives/003459.html

http://www.mediaresearch.org/

http://www.chronwatch.com/editorial/2002-04-03c.asp
Silentotto
2004-02-24 01:11:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
***@webtv.net (Grand Theft Otto a Yellow Journalist) wrote in message news:<16165-403A3E7A-***@storefull-3238.bay.webtv.net>...

You've been throwing a two year temper tantrum Cryin' Cowboy.

Aren't your eyes sore and red from whining so loud and long?

You're the one that choose to grab your ankles for the RNC.

Don't whine to me cuz you hitched your wagon to a failed presidency
run by a dull corporate shill who packed his administration with
liars, crooks and fascists.

But I guess it's not his fault. That was the price he had to pay so
daddys pals would steal the election for him.
Post by Grand Theft Otto a Yellow Journalist
To Hell with your Socialist Welfare Nanny State.
No...

To hell with your corrupt, fascist, corporate police state.

We can back up our wishes to. Unlike you and the corrupt corporate
backers you lay for.

Not even Nader can save Bush's sorry ass this time.

And, we won't let them get away with stealing another election.

There isn't a goddamn thing you can do about it.

The bottom line is that there are far more people like me than there
are contemptable, disgusting, greedy, lying, selfish government
sponges like you who spend their time sucking Savage dry while
Limbaugh blows in their ass.

We're taking the Whitehouse.

You can't stop it.

Better yet, you know it to.

I'd laugh at you some more, but I don't have the energy after all the
laughing I did at your expense earler.

Aren't you gonna tell me how you and your fellow fascist Republipukes
will revolt after we take the presidency away from you?

Gee... I feel cheated somehow.

Choke on your liver and drop dead, Cryin' Cowboy.

You're an asshole.
Grand Theft Otto the NeoKommie Kunt
2004-02-25 14:39:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ken
Silentotto
a.k.a. SillyAuntOtto
< waa-aaa! my socialist-democrat party
is a 21st century dud ! >
That's why reasonable people jokingly refer to your irrelevant and
fracturing party as the modern day ill-Liberal Duddocrats.

BTW, how's your hyena-like clit hanging today, you typically lying and
tax-dollar stealing Neo-Commie cunt?
da truth
2004-02-25 16:08:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grand Theft Otto the NeoKommie Kunt
That's why reasonable people jokingly refer to your irrelevant and
fracturing party as the modern day ill-Liberal Duddocrats.
Thanks to the incompetence of the current administration, and more popular
votes in 2000, the Democrats are hardly a "fracturing party." The true
"reasonable people" know this. Time to get on board.
Post by Grand Theft Otto the NeoKommie Kunt
BTW, how's your hyena-like clit hanging today, you typically lying and
tax-dollar stealing Neo-Commie cunt?
Ooooh. Them talks dirty out in jerkwater.
Progressive Pussy for Gigolo Kerry
2004-02-26 00:22:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Bawney Fwank's wittle wover
"da twooff" puked pinko like
the spineless piece of Socialist-DemoCRAP
< i live like a rat in a cage in a pollution-ridden
dirty tap-watered big "shitty" where bums fuck
each other in the butt on the sidewalk
and then later lick the shit off each other's
dicks in front of little kids >
We've got the guns. We've even got the numbers. We've got the farm and
range lands. We grow the food. We even own the factories that build
the guns. We own the factories that build the jet fighters and bombers
and airliners, the automobiles, the computers, the bullets, the trains,
the trucks, the helicopters; we own the HMOs, the banks, Wall Street,
the communication companies.

We have the military.

We have the U.S. government.

The White House, Senate, House of Representatives, state legislatures
and governorships, which you DizzyRATS all had in 1993 but threw away on
Hilly's Billy KKKlintoon's bimbos and funny-money scandals, are all in
the hands of the Republicans now, here in 2004.

You evil idiot Libs are stuck like a mass of horse flies on manure piles
in big "shitties," in densely concentrated high population areas full of
delbert dweebs like you, "da puke."

You limp-wristed dick-shrivelled spooge spattered-assed ostrich-brained
linguini-spined
cocksucking buttfucks, who are scared to death of "making the
Islamo-Fascist terrorists mad," are going to grow some nuts and try to
take us on in a bona fide Bolshevik-styled 1917-type revolution, are
you?

LOL!

A bunch of Chicken Little full mooner snoozing losers like you
Duddocrats?

Right. Sure. You're simply going to try to shyster us out of our
national sovereignty and then turn our military over to the cravenly
corrupt and vainly venal auspices of the feckless reckless
communist-oriented U.N.?

Oh, yeah. Of course. You're just going to try to sweet talk us easily
out of our hard-earned tax dollars so every bloody over-breeding
deadbeat Commie worldwide will get his/her/its poofy anus wiped from
cradle to grave courtesy of the one-world Socialist-DemonRAT government
funded by the duped American taxpayer?

Huh, Elmer?

Think again,

_D_O_U_C_H_E_ _B_A_G_.

You'd better start extending your hands across the aisle to those "silly
Christians" on what you pussy-assholes call the "Retarded Religious
Right."

Because those good church going Christians -- they'll try to save you
Commiecrats from guys like me who'd be more than happy to take a one-way
trip to Holy Hell if only I could just take all you buttfucking
cocksucking Cretincrats with me.

Recipe for Hades for poof "progressives:" Surround the Y2K "blue Goron
zones" with tanks and artillery. Create no-fly zones above them. Cut
off water. Cut off food and medical supplies. Cut off all
communication. Let starve like Leningrad in WW2. And when the time is
just right, when cannibalism is rampant, when things come to a boil,
just wade in with thousands upon thousands of trusty chainsaws. Cut off
their heads. Stick 'em on pikes. Let the ravens and magpies have a
feast on their dried eyeballs. Grind the bodies up for grizzly bear
feed and shark bait.
jerkwater
Yeppir, Clem. Ya best hook up with them rednecks in the Bible belt real
quick-like, there, mistah green horn. 'Cuz ex-military cats like 'yours
truly' here, who's lived in El Paso, Los Angeles, London, Minneapolis,
Chicago, Gary, Quad Cities, and Agana, Guam and Hannover, Germany but
made it out to own good chunks of pristine land (your butt buddy Sen.
Ketchup Boy Gigolo Kerry owns some only 70 miles away as the crow flies,
as a matter of fact!) in areas of the wild, wild west here where folks
from the world 'round pay big time tourist bucks just to visit, have got
your wingeing whimpering whining poozbutt number. Them Good Book
thumpers -- then at that partic'lar point in time, they be yer only
friends left on earth, ya Stalinist Big Brothah Socialist-Hyenacrat
muvvahfuggah. Outside o' Osama 'n' Saddam 'n' the Ba'athist boys, o'
course; they be real *good* friends o' yourn, ain't that right? But
them "Thumpers" 'n' them "Jeezuz Freaks" ya'all despise and detest so
much -- why they'll protest for mercy upon you. But I ain't gots none
t'all in my heart for useless donkey shit crawling Commie maggots like
you, punk.

Want your head pike made of alder, aspen or spruce, there, Brucey?

But you surely know where you can stick it first, don'tchya?
Silentotto
2004-02-26 09:05:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
***@webtv.net (Progressive Pussy for Gigolo Kerry) wrote in message news:<9966-403D3C39-***@storefull-3231.bay.webtv.net>...

You're an asshole Cryin' Cowboy.

You just spent an hour typing out garbage and I just spent 1 second
snipping it with out reading it.

I didn't read it because it's more shit posted by a shit for brains 2
dollar whore for for the RNC who spends his time wanking and
fantisizing about blowing Savage and Limbaugh.

We liberals are taking the country back from your corporate masters
this fall and you can't stop it.

Get that Cryin' Cowboy?

You can't stop it.

So, go back to fucking your sheep, you crying, wanking loser.

You can't make any difference.

All you can do is cry and rant.

Nobody is interested in your crying or your ranting.
LeftTenant Ketchup Boy FlipFlopGigolo
2004-03-04 14:36:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
"One for you, nineteen for me. 'Cause I'm the TAXMAN!"

-- George Harrison, from the song "Taxman," from the Beatles album,
**REVOLVER,** 1966.
< an academician socialist, i am. oh, yes! my
ideas have the consistency of one giant
donkey fart, they do. i've got a bureaucrat's
pencil whipper for a dick with an attached
douche bag for ballocks. i think the difference
between the Left and Right is this: we on the
Left use baseball bats for anal dildos, while
those on the Right use baseball bats like AL
CAPONE did to crush skulls full of socialist
mush. i worship ADOLF HITLER and his
NATIONAL-SOCIALISTS and how they ruled
the Vichy French wimps. i want to kill the rich
and tax the middle class like a bitch. And I
pander to the Michigan blacks because i think
they're just helpless twits. >
That's exactly why you emit the typically Liberal stench of an old
witch's dried up slit.

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
da truth
2004-03-05 21:51:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by LeftTenant Ketchup Boy FlipFlopGigolo
"One for you, nineteen for me. 'Cause I'm the TAXMAN!"
-- George Harrison, from the song "Taxman," from the Beatles album,
**REVOLVER,** 1966.
No kidding. Many of those tax and spend republiCANS (as in go to the can)
stink on ice.
ultraLib da Twooff Swallows Pink Jizz
2004-03-05 22:49:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by da truth
Post by LeftTenant Ketchup Boy FlipFlopGigolo
TAXMAN!
No kidding.
That's KKKerry, you KKKommie KKKlown.
Post by da truth
Post by LeftTenant Ketchup Boy FlipFlopGigolo
Bawney Fwank's wimp-dicked wittle wover
"da twooff" drooled this drivel out the anus
< i am a coward.
i am afraid of terrorists.
i think we should appease them at all costs.
now, let me go back to sticking my head in the sand
while Bubba da Clumsy 'n' Goofy Gangsta sticks his
pencil-whipping dick up my spooge-spattered ass.
OOO000ooo! i *like* that!
meanwhile, i must ignore the truth
about myself and my out-of-power
piece of DemoCRAP Party
or i'll go all-the-way insane. >
Neo-Commie butt punk ostrich.

?Can't face these truths, can you, douche bag?:

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
da truth
2004-02-24 17:12:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by From Hillary With Love
Must be difficult since you're no working man.
Do you also squat to pee?
Sexist, too. It figures.
ultra Lib Dukakis Mondale KetchupBoy
2004-03-05 16:19:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by From Hillary With Love
Do you also squat to pee?
Bawney Fwank's wittle wover
Sexist, too. It figures.
It's your fault that you cut off your own balls and dick, no one else's,
you over-taxing anti-War on Terror neo-Commie cunt. Why do you blame
other people for your propensity to lick your own shit off of other
people's pricks? Go out to San Franqueebo and get married to another
buttfucked cocksucker like yourself, you Stalinist turd dollop.

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Sid9
2004-03-05 16:29:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by ultra Lib Dukakis Mondale KetchupBoy
Post by From Hillary With Love
Do you also squat to pee?
Bawney Fwank's wittle wover
Sexist, too. It figures.
It's your fault that you cut off your own balls and dick, no one
else's, you over-taxing anti-War on Terror neo-Commie cunt. Why do
you blame other people for your propensity to lick your own shit off
of other people's pricks? Go out to San Franqueebo and get married
to another buttfucked cocksucker like yourself, you Stalinist turd
dollop.
"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant
and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has
ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of
mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
destruction. .. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein.
He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ...
He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so
consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued
deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ...
So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is
real ..."
- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with
the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including,
if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to
respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs."
- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass
destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.
=== === === === === === === === === ===
John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm
http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm
http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm
http://www.fakewarriors.com
http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/
http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson
===== ===== =====
former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Our WEBTV loony coward is back with a new disguise!
Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
2004-03-05 17:42:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In January of 1993, the Democrats had the Hillary & Bill Clinton White
House, the U.S. Senate, the House of Representatives, the state
legislatures and governorships. Now, in March of 2004, the Republicans
have all that. Why? Because of the Clintons and all their money
scandals, bimbo eruptions, lies, and especially because of their tax
hikes of historic proportions and their sheer negligence in the
worldwide fight against Islamo-Fascist terrorism. If the Democrats lose
again as they lost in the 1994, Y2K, 2002 and 2003 California recall
elections, they'll be totally and completely irrelevant.
Post by Sid9
(Shit9) puked this
loony coward
That would be you, Sid, you paid-to-lie full mooner lying sack of
Chicken Little shit D.N.C. hack. Fuck off and die, you James Carville
butt bitch. *You're* the hideous heinous hyena-like carrion-eating
motherfucker who cries crocodile tears over each and every G.I. casualty
while you stab those very same G.I.s in the back in Iraq and Afghanistan
solely for partisan political gain for your out-of-power piece of
DemoCRAP Party with only one god damned plank: "We hate Bush!" - in its
splintering platform: "We hate American power!"

Sid, you clueless toothless useless Hyenacrat, you ought to be deported
to Afghanistan or Iraq and used as a human mine detector. Then maybe
justice will be done and you'll be blown all to Holy Hell where
worthless donkey shit crawling maggots like you belong.

_Y_O_U_

_T_R_A_I_T_O_R_O_U_S_

_G._I._ _B_A_C_K_-_S_T_A_B_B_I_N_G_

_A_S_S_H_O_L_E_ !!!!!!

?No comment on the following, Shit9, you neo-Commie cunt?:

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
da truth
2004-03-05 21:48:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Sid9
Our WEBTV loony coward is back with a new disguise!
Cowards resort to disguises. "He" has nothing meaningful to say.
John Fonda Dukakis Mondale KetchupBoy
2004-03-05 23:41:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by da truth
Cowards resort to disguises.
Is "da truth" your real name?

"Sid9" is *his* real name?

Typically lying piece of over-taxing anti-War on Terror ill-Liberal
DemoCRAP cocksucking buttfucked hypocrites!

Chicken Littles always running in circles, always begging with their
grubby little hands out, and always crying about how the sky is
falling...

...always _L_O_S_E_R_S_ !!!!!!
Post by da truth
Post by LeftTenant Ketchup Boy FlipFlopGigolo
Bawney Fwank's wimp-dicked wittle wover
"da twooff" drooled this drivel out the anus
< i am an anti-War on Terror coward of the Nth degree.
i am deathly afraid of the Islamo-Fascist terrorists.
i think we should appease them all at all costs.
now, let me go back to sticking my head in the sand
while Bubba da Clumsy 'n' Goofy Gangsta sticks his
pencil-whipping dick up my pussy-like spooge-spattered ass.
OOO000ooo! i *like* that! meanwhile, i must ignore
the truth about myself and my out-of-power piece of
DemoCRAP Party or i'll go all-the-way insane. >
Neo-Commie butt punk ostrich.

?Can't face these truths, can you, douche bag?:

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Sid9
2004-03-06 03:38:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by John Fonda Dukakis Mondale KetchupBoy
Post by da truth
Cowards resort to disguises.
Is "da truth" your real name?
"Sid9" is *his* real name?
Yes, Sid is my real name.
1 through 8 were taken by others....I settled on 9

I don't have to indulge you your conservative vulgarity.
da truth
2004-03-06 04:36:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Sid9
Yes, Sid is my real name.
1 through 8 were taken by others....I settled on 9
I don't have to indulge you your conservative vulgarity.
You see, not all conservatism is vulgarity, but most vulgarity is
"conservative," or neo-conservative, as today's CONservatives aren't even
good at being conservative.
McGovern Mondale Dole Dukakis Kerry
2004-03-06 06:40:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Sid9
vulgarity
Defines William Jefferson Clinton, da Clumsy 'n' Goofy D.N.C. Gangsta,
and his Mena Arkansas Airport goons and cronies to a "T."
Post by Sid9
vulgarity
Bubba KKKlintoon. Period.
Post by Sid9
vulgarity
He lies. He steals. He cheats.
Post by Sid9
vulgarity
So does his wife, the Hildebeast.
Post by Sid9
vulgarity
Perfect definition for the de facto "fearless leader" and former
rapist-in-chief of the repulsively disgusting Hyenacrats, who stab our
G.I.s in the back in Afghanistan and Iraq in the feeble, feckless,
reckless hope that their despicable acts will get their Cretincrat
Party's power back, which All-Blow-and-No-Go Bubba threw away by lying
and cheating and stealing.
Post by Sid9
vulgarity
That's Slack Walleye all over, . . . the terrorist appeaser, . . . the
draft dodger, . . . the Dildocrats' idol and hero.
Post by Sid9
vulgarity
Perfect fit. For a pitiful bunch of out-of-power ostrich-brained
chicken-shits. Still led by none other than Slick Wilhelm himself.
Desperately clutching straws. And trying to hold on to their
vain-"glorious" past.
Post by Sid9
vulgarity
Yeppir. That's the mob of shit crawling maggots that the Duddocrats
have made of themselves.
Post by Sid9
vulgarity
Nothing more vulgar than shit-dipping butt-crust-munching cocksucking
poofs getting "married" in San Franqueebo. And they're all DemonRATS.
BUTT! of course.
Post by Sid9
Post by LeftTenant Ketchup Boy FlipFlopGigolo
Bawney Fwank's wimp-dicked wittle wover
"da twooff" drooled this drivel out the anus
< i am an anti-War on Terror coward of the Nth degree.
i am deathly afraid of the Islamo-Fascist terrorists.
i think we should appease them all at all costs.
now, let me go back to sticking my head in the sand
while Bubba da Clumsy 'n' Goofy Gangsta sticks his
pencil-whipping dick up my pussy-like spooge-spattered ass.
OOO000ooo! i *like* that! meanwhile, i must ignore
the truth about myself and my out-of-power piece of
DemoCRAP Party or i'll go all-the-way insane. >
Neo-Commie butt punk ostrich.

?Can't face these truths, can you, douche bag?:

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
McGovern Mondale Dole Dukakis Kerry
2004-03-06 07:08:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Sid9
Sid is my real name.
My condolences.

No "EL" 'precursor', so to speak?

Well, then, that's kinda tough, huh?

So... What's your last name? 'Vicious'?

You hang with the Sex Pistols?

Or just your little butt-buddy "da twooff," there?
Post by Sid9
Post by LeftTenant Ketchup Boy FlipFlopGigolo
Bawney Fwank's wimp-dicked wittle wover
"da twooff" drooled this drivel out the anus
< i am an anti-War on Terror coward of the Nth degree.
i am deathly afraid of the Islamo-Fascist terrorists.
i think we should appease them all at all costs.
now, let me go back to sticking my head in the sand
while Bubba da Clumsy 'n' Goofy Gangsta sticks his
pencil-whipping dick up my pussy-like spooge-spattered ass.
OOO000ooo! i *like* that! meanwhile, i must ignore
the truth about myself and my out-of-power piece of
DemoCRAP Party or i'll go all-the-way insane. >
Neo-Commie butt punk ostrich.

?Can't face these truths, can you, douche bag?:

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Mr. N
2004-03-05 18:23:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by ultra Lib Dukakis Mondale KetchupBoy
It's your fault that you cut off your own balls and dick, no one else's,
you over-taxing anti-War on Terror neo-Commie cunt. Why do you blame
other people for your propensity to lick your own shit off of other
people's pricks? Go out to San Franqueebo and get married to another
buttfucked cocksucker like yourself, you Stalinist turd dollop.
Could you do me a favor?

Could you repeat this paragraph, word-for-word as often as possible?
Preferably in front of TV news cameras wearing a Bush/Cheny 2004 t-shirt?

Thanks much.
--
-My Real Name
Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
2004-03-05 19:30:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mr. N
(Mr. Numb Nuts) puked pinko diarrhea
Could you do me a favor?
No.

I wouldn't piss on your godless anti-Ten-Commandments
faggot-loving spooge-spattered ass if it was fucking on fire, you shit
crawling Hyenacrat maggot.
Post by Mr. N
Cheny [sic]
You typically illiterate ill-Liberal neo-socialist piece of DemoCRAP.
It's spelled 'Cheney', you

_A_N_T_I_-_W_A_R_ _O_N_ _T_E_R_R_O_R_

_F_U_C_K_T_A_R_D_ !
Post by Mr. N
Thanks much.
Fuck off and die, you "Terrorist Appeaser Draft Dodger" Bubba
KKKlintoon's butt bitch. Or go live in North Korea, Cuba, or Vietnam
where you very well belong, you

_O_V_E_R_T_A_X_I_N_G_

butt-sludge-slurping cocksucking assfucked Chicken-Little
ostrich-brained gutless spineless lying anti-War on Terror neo-Commie

_C_U_N_T_ !

But first, suck on this, Mr. Numb Nuts, you donkey-jizz-swallowing
skunk-fucking scumbag:

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Mr. N
2004-03-06 17:19:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
Post by Mr. N
Could you do me a favor?
No.
So you don't want to stand up and publicly declare your beliefs while also
announcing your support for a Bush/Cheney re-election?
Post by Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
I wouldn't piss on your godless anti-Ten-Commandments
faggot-loving spooge-spattered ass if it was fucking on fire, you shit
crawling Hyenacrat maggot.
Yeah - that's the stuff. So you don't want people to KNOW you think like
this AND support G.W. Bush? How come?
Post by Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
_A_N_T_I_-_W_A_R_ _O_N_ _T_E_R_R_O_R_
_F_U_C_K_T_A_R_D_ !
Oh, I'm hip with the war on terror. You see - I live in this country, too,
and I have no more desire to have myself, my family, my child or anyone I
love or care about blown to bits. So the War on Terror is officially a Good
Thing. The thing is - Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and Bush has made
America LESS save than it was before, so I don't see him as the guy to
prosecute it anymore.
Post by Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
Fuck off and die, you "Terrorist Appeaser Draft Dodger" Bubba
KKKlintoon's butt bitch. Or go live in North Korea, Cuba, or Vietnam
where you very well belong, you
Good stuff, that's it. So if you're so proud of your views, again - make
sure you announce them often, preferably where TV cameras can see you waving
a sign supporting G.W. Bush and Co.
Post by Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
butt-sludge-slurping cocksucking assfucked Chicken-Little
ostrich-brained gutless spineless lying anti-War on Terror neo-Commie
Keep it coming. Thank you for your work to help elect John Kerry the next
President of the United States of America.
--
-My Real Name
Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
2004-03-05 20:06:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Recent A.P. poll has Ralph-baby at 6%.

Neo-Commie Hanoi John _Fonda _Flip _Flop Kerry shits big RED bricks.

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Sid9
2004-03-05 20:18:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
Recent A.P. poll has Ralph-baby at 6%.
Neo-Commie Hanoi John _Fonda _Flip _Flop Kerry shits big RED bricks.
BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
Enjoy it while you can.

1.The uncertainty in this poll is +/- 3.5% (huge)
2. Eight months to go.

Events may control the outcome more than anything else.
Events neither the Republican nor the Dermocrats can controil
Republican Double Standard
2004-03-05 20:27:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Sid9
Post by Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
Recent A.P. poll has Ralph-baby at 6%.
Neo-Commie Hanoi John _Fonda _Flip _Flop Kerry shits big RED bricks.
BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
Enjoy it while you can.
1.The uncertainty in this poll is +/- 3.5% (huge)
2. Eight months to go.
Events may control the outcome more than anything else.
Events neither the Republican nor the Dermocrats can controil
My money says that Nader drops out by convention time.
--
"I am angry that so many of the sons of the powerful and well-placed...
managed to wangle slots in Reserve and National Guard units...Of the
many tragedies of Vietnam, this raw class discrimination strikes me as
the most damaging to the ideal that all Americans are created equal and
owe equal allegiance to their country." (Colin Powell’s autobiography,
My American Journey, p. 148)
Sid9
2004-03-05 20:48:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Republican Double Standard
Post by Sid9
Post by Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
Recent A.P. poll has Ralph-baby at 6%.
Neo-Commie Hanoi John _Fonda _Flip _Flop Kerry shits big RED bricks.
BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
Enjoy it while you can.
1.The uncertainty in this poll is +/- 3.5% (huge)
2. Eight months to go.
Events may control the outcome more than anything else.
Events neither the Republican nor the Dermocrats can controil
My money says that Nader drops out by convention time.
Nader said, very clearly and cryptically,
to Tim Russert on a question of dropping
out, "Invite me back before the election"
ultra lib Dukakis Mondale Kerry
2004-03-05 21:03:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Republican Double Standard
Piece of "DemoCRAP Double Standard"
My money says that Nader
drops out by convention time.
Of course, by then Bubba KKKlintoon da Clumsy 'n' Goofy D.N.C. Gangsta
will have given Ralphie-baby an "offer he can't refuse" so to make way
for the Hildebeast.

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Tempest
2004-03-06 02:22:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Republican Double Standard
Post by Sid9
Post by Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
Recent A.P. poll has Ralph-baby at 6%.
Neo-Commie Hanoi John _Fonda _Flip _Flop Kerry shits big RED bricks.
BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
Enjoy it while you can.
1.The uncertainty in this poll is +/- 3.5% (huge)
2. Eight months to go.
Events may control the outcome more than anything else.
Events neither the Republican nor the Dermocrats can controil
My money says that Nader drops out by convention time.
I believe he's in it just to get air time to use against Bush.
--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748
McGovern Mondale Dukakis KetchupBoy
2004-03-06 07:45:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Tempest
"Tempest in a Teapot"
pissed this pinko whizz
apathy of a citizen
Nothing is so apathetic as the common knuckle-dragging typical union
douche bag Duddocrat who believes that 9-11 can't happen again simply
because he can't imagine it and neither can his dopey stewards.
Post by Tempest
Bawney Fwank's wimp-dicked wittle wover
"da twooff" drooled this drivel out the anus
< i am an anti-War on Terror coward of the Nth degree.
i am deathly afraid of the Islamo-Fascist terrorists.
i think we should appease them all at all costs.
now, let me go back to sticking my head in the sand
while Bubba da Clumsy 'n' Goofy Gangsta sticks his
pencil-whipping dick up my pussy-like spooge-spattered ass.
OOO000ooo! i *like* that! meanwhile, i must ignore
the truth about myself and my out-of-power piece of
DemoCRAP Party or i'll go all-the-way insane. >
Neo-Commie butt punk ostrich.

?Can't face these truths, can you, douche bag?:

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
ultra lib Dukakis Mondale Kerry
2004-03-05 20:44:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
(Shit9) puked this pinko turd
out the anus in the middle of his
< i'm a man!
at least i think
that i am! >
Not only 'no', but _H_E_L_L_ 'NO'!

You're a dried up old dirty cunt and you stink like one, too. Lying
sack of DemoCRAP. Send your lame lard ass to Hell so the Devil can
buttfuck it over and over and over and over and over again.

Suck on this, Shit9, you "evil idiot Lib" James Carville butt bitch:

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Mr. N
2004-03-06 17:19:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dole Dukakis Mondale Kerry
Recent A.P. poll has Ralph-baby at 6%.
Neo-Commie Hanoi John _Fonda _Flip _Flop Kerry shits big RED bricks.
Another crude slur
With a campaign of distortion and lies, the right-wing smear machine is
trying to impugn the military honor of John Kerry.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Joe Conason



March 6, 2004 | The contrast between the military careers of George W.
Bush and John Kerry is drawing veterans to the Democratic Party -- and
maddening conservative Republicans who have grown accustomed to monopolizing
the symbolism of flag and country. To tarnish Kerry, the right has reached
back more than 30 years to develop a narrative that transforms him from hero
to traitor, by distorting his antiwar activism after he returned from
Vietnam.

They hope to convince America that by testifying and organizing for peace,
the young Navy lieutenant somehow "dishonored" his fellow sailors and
soldiers.

This effort began quite crudely, with the anonymous distribution of a faked
photo of Kerry with Jane Fonda. But now Kerry critics are focused on the
so-called "Winter Soldier" investigation -- a public event staged in January
1971 by Kerry and other leaders of Vietnam Veterans Against the War to
expose the brutality and devastation of the Indochina conflict.

The right-wing extremists at Free Republic have set up a new "Winter
Soldier" Web site devoted to that event, highlighting Kerry's subsequent
testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about alleged U.S.
war crimes. According to the Freeper theory, he "launched his political
career" by denigrating his comrades in arms, although nobody who reads his
testimony will find much evidence to support that accusation. (He did run
for Congress in 1972 -- and lost in part because of his VVAW connections.)

Coordinating with the Freeper attack are Texas chicken-hawk Rep. Tom DeLay,
who recently upbraided Kerry for the Winter Soldier episode, and Gary
Aldrich, the former White House FBI agent who fabricated salacious stories
about Bill and Hillary Clinton, who now suspects that Kerry was
"pro-Communistic" and is demanding to see his old FBI files.

Meanwhile, the National Review descended still further, featuring a weird
article by Romania's former Communist spy chief, in which he insinuates that
Kerry, and anyone else who talked about atrocities in Vietnam, was really an
instrument of KGB propaganda. (It is remarkable to see a "conservative"
magazine publish a smear written by a man who once facilitated the
atrocities of the Ceausescu regime.) The essay by Ion Mihai Pacepa, who
defected to the West in 1978, is titled "Kerry's Soviet Rhetoric," and
claims that his testimony about the war in 1971 "sounds exactly like the
disinformation line that the Soviets were sowing worldwide throughout the
Vietnam era."

Had Kerry said or done something stupid at the impressionable age of 25 --
after surviving horrific jungle warfare that had cost the lives of several
close friends -- his furious protests would be forgivable more than 30 years
later. He, too, might have been "young and foolish when he was young and
foolish," as a famous man put it. But in contrast to the VVAW's radicalized
veterans and other elements of the antiwar movement, Kerry was sober and
mature. Some of his own allies openly disdained him for his moderation.
Although he, too, was disillusioned and angry, Kerry insisted on working
"within the system." During that period he spent much of his energy trying
to register young people to vote for antiwar congressional candidates.

It's also true that he led raucous demonstrations in Washington, and
participated in the "Winter Soldier" hearings. When he appeared before the
Senate three months later, he spoke at length about reported American
atrocities, attributing most of the specific allegations to veterans who had
testified during Winter Soldier. Graphic references to rape, dismemberment
and murder took up less than a paragraph of his lengthy testimony, but they
certainly brought no credit on the U.S. military. Yet his eloquent words won
bipartisan praise from the senators who listened to him.

Kerry didn't join the antiwar movement to indict his fellow soldiers; he
often spoke with passion about the injustices done to them, both during the
war and when they returned home to inadequate medical care and an
indifferent government. His purpose was to prevent more of them from being
killed, as he said over and over again.

He didn't try to absolve himself when denouncing the indiscriminate violence
of the war. On "Meet the Press," he confessed that he had participated in
"the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed
in that I took part in shootings in free-fire zones." But he felt strongly
that U.S. military commanders and civilian policymakers were far more
culpable for those atrocities than the men who obeyed their orders. Appalled
by the civilian casualties in the "free-fire zones" marked out by their
commanders, Kerry and other junior officers had gone to Saigon in January
1969 to complain to their superior -- and were of course ignored.

The free-fire zones, the use of napalm, the carpet-bombing and the
assassination programs were all aspects of a guerrilla conflict that could
not be prosecuted without killing thousands of civilians. Only by falsifying
history -- and assuming that nobody will remember the truth -- can Kerry's
right-wing critics claim that he somehow misled the country about what was
happening in Vietnam. The smear depends on historical amnesia.

Last year the suppressed recollections of that disturbing past emerged
again, when investigative journalist Gregory Vistica revealed wartime
secrets long concealed by Bob Kerrey. Although the most incriminating
details remain disputed, the former senator and Congressional Medal of Honor
winner has admitted that he and Navy SEALS under his command massacred
civilians during a nighttime raid on a hamlet called Thanh Phong in 1969.
The ensuing debate over his conduct revived searing memories of My Lai, the
village where hundreds of civilians were raped and murdered in March 1968 by
U.S. soldiers.

In 1971, John Kerry told the Senate that if William Calley and the other
soldiers who committed those atrocities were guilty, then so were the
commanders who had made such crimes inevitable and then covered them up. "I
think if you are going to try Lieutenant Calley then you must at the same
time, if this country is going to demand respect for the law, you must at
the same time try all those other people who have responsibility, and any
aversion that we may have to the verdict as veterans is not to say that
Calley should be freed, not to say that he is innocent, but to say that you
can't just take him alone." Kerry's critics argue that My Lai was an
isolated incident, but at least one celebrated general doesn't agree.

Secretary of State Colin Powell held a command position in the Army's
Americal Division, which had included Calley's unit, and he was asked to
investigate the earliest allegations about My Lai. He failed to uncover the
massacre and was later accused of facilitating the coverup. Whether that
accusation is fair or not, Powell knows what happened in Vietnam.

"My Lai was an appalling example of much that had gone wrong in Vietnam," he
wrote in his bestselling autobiography, "My American Journey." "The
involvement of so many unprepared officers and noncoms led to breakdowns in
morale, discipline and professional judgment -- and to horrors like My
Lai -- as the troops became numb to what appeared to be endless and mindless
slaughter." For some reason, despite his loyalty to the president, Powell
doesn't seem eager to attack John Kerry.

da truth
2004-03-05 21:49:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mr. N
Could you do me a favor?
Could you repeat this paragraph, word-for-word as often as possible?
Preferably in front of TV news cameras wearing a Bush/Cheny 2004 t-shirt?
Thanks much.
Yes. It would be nice for America to know the ilk of some who support the
current administration. That would certainly make some voters think twice.
John Fonda Dukakis Mondale KetchupBoy
2004-03-06 00:28:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by da truth
Yes. It would be nice for America to know the
ilk of some who support the Kerry
campaign. That would certainly make some
voters think twice.
You mean like the terrorists of E.L.F., like the anti-Ten Commandment,
godless, communist-oriented A.C.L.U., and like the pedophiles of
N.A.M.B.L.A.?

Like the traitorous and former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics-run
V.V.A.W. (Vietnam Veterans Against the War), of whom Hanoi John _Fonda
_Flip _Flop Kerry the Ketchup Boy Gigolo was a part in the early 1970s?

You mean like the AIDS-ridden gay marriage advocates who like to spread
killer STD diseases and stick their dicks up each others' shit holes and
then lick their own shit off each others' dicks? How disgustingly
filthy! How typically 'liberal'!

Like the "evil idiot Libs" who're pro-abortion unborn baby murderers?

Like the whining wingeing wimps who want to let convicted killers go
free instead of giving them the capital punishment that they so well
deserve?

You mean like the Ba'athist Islamo-Fascist terrorists in Iraq?

Like the 9-11, Al-Qaeda and Taliban terrorist detainees in Guantanamo,
Cuba?

You mean like the Osama bin Laden followers in Pakistan and Afghanistan?

Like Fidel Castro in Cuba?

Like Kim Jong IL in North Korea?

Like Kerry's good ol' butt-buddies, the Commies now running things in
the country of Vietnam, one of the poorest, most oppressive and most
miserable nations on earth?

Thanks to shit-for-brains traitorous Neo-Commie motherfuckers like John
_Forbes_ Kerry?

..."da twooff" -- you

_S_T_U_P_I_D_ _F_U_C_K_ !!!!!!...
Post by da truth
Post by LeftTenant Ketchup Boy FlipFlopGigolo
Bawney Fwank's wimp-dicked wittle wover
"da twooff" drooled this drivel out the anus
< i am an anti-War on Terror coward of the Nth degree.
i am deathly afraid of the Islamo-Fascist terrorists.
i think we should appease them all at all costs.
now, let me go back to sticking my head in the sand
while Bubba da Clumsy 'n' Goofy Gangsta sticks his
pencil-whipping dick up my pussy-like spooge-spattered ass.
OOO000ooo! i *like* that! meanwhile, i must ignore
the truth about myself and my out-of-power piece of
DemoCRAP Party or i'll go all-the-way insane. >
Neo-Commie butt punk ostrich.

?Can't face these truths, can you, douche bag?:

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
da truth
2004-03-05 21:47:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Sexist, too. It figures.
yes, let's repeat - sexist. not to mention profane, right-wing, and
anti-liberty. just more reasons NOT to vote bush - for he has "supporters"
of this ilk.
John Fonda Dukakis Mondale KetchupBoy
2004-03-05 23:29:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
he has "supporters" of this ilk
You mean that the super-high-tax-hikers, the
Islamo-Fascist-terrorist-sympathizers, the
gay-marriage-shit-dick-lickers-'n'-stickers, and the
Neo-Commie-freebie-gummint-hand-out pinko pukers like you support the
richest Senator, the whitest Senator, and the most Liberal Senator,
Hanoi John _Fonda _Flip _Flop Kerry the Ketchup Boy Gigolo?

!BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
Post by LeftTenant Ketchup Boy FlipFlopGigolo
Bawney Fwank's wimp-dicked wittle wover
"da twooff" drooled this drivel out the anus
< i am an anti-War on Terror coward of the Nth degree.
i am deathly afraid of the Islamo-Fascist terrorists.
i think we should appease them all at all costs.
now, let me go back to sticking my head in the sand
while Bubba da Clumsy 'n' Goofy Gangsta sticks his
pencil-whipping dick up my pussy-like spooge-spattered ass.
OOO000ooo! i *like* that! meanwhile, i must ignore
the truth about myself and my out-of-power piece of
DemoCRAP Party or i'll go all-the-way insane. >
Neo-Commie butt punk ostrich.

?Can't face these truths, can you, douche bag?:

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
da truth
2004-03-06 04:39:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
"John Fonda Dukakis Mondale KetchupBoy" <***@webtv.net> makes
the Dems job easier. "He" gives enough reasons, with every post, not to
vote RepubliCAN (as in go to the can). At least this isn't Stalinist
Russia, and we can make a choice - boo, hoo "cowboy," back to the ranch ya
go!
McGovern Mondale Dole Dukakis Kerry
2004-03-06 06:55:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
this isn't Stalinist Russia
It will be if Billy's Hilly, the Hildebeast ever takes the POTUS
"orifice" again. Her and all her bloody F.B.I. files on all her
political enemies: How Orwellian can you get?! Especially as the 90%
DemonRAT voting so-called "mainstream" media covers for the fat-legged,
cow-faced, cold-fished, power mad, money grubbing, Lesbian bitch.
boo, hoo
That's what *you'll* do come November 2nd.

Can your completely out-of-power, practically irrelevant, Ralph Nader
fracturing DizzyRAT Party really afford another defeat like you've
suffered in the 2002 midterm and the 2003 California recall elections?
Post by LeftTenant Ketchup Boy FlipFlopGigolo
Bawney Fwank's wimp-dicked wittle wover
"da twooff" drooled this drivel out the anus
< i am an anti-War on Terror coward of the Nth degree.
i am deathly afraid of the Islamo-Fascist terrorists.
i think we should appease them all at all costs.
now, let me go back to sticking my head in the sand
while Bubba da Clumsy 'n' Goofy Gangsta sticks his
pencil-whipping dick up my pussy-like spooge-spattered ass.
OOO000ooo! i *like* that! meanwhile, i must ignore
the truth about myself and my out-of-power piece of
DemoCRAP Party or i'll go all-the-way insane. >
Neo-Commie butt punk ostrich.

?Can't face these truths, can you, douche bag?:

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Ken
2004-02-20 03:34:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Silentotto
Kerry is free to come to his own conclusions, just as I'm free to come
to mine.
Unlike you and your fellow Republicans, I can think for myself, and if
I come to a different conclusion than Kerry does, so be it.
With spelling corrected



This my friend , your opening statement has just discredited you and
made the rest of your post irrelevant.
1. I'm not a registered Republican
2. You've basically told me I'm unable to think for myself.

SCREW YOU


FLUSH

Now you're irrelevant too.


Ken
11Bravo
Matt Osborn @attglobal.net>
2004-02-20 04:20:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Silentotto
I don't have to worry about getting tossed out of the party because
I'm not marching in lock step with the leadership, unlike certain
other political parties.
Lock step & leadership? Do you also talk about 'workers' and the
proletariat?
Dem Sen Robert KKK Wizard Sheets Byrd
2004-02-20 06:19:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ken
silentotto
'workers' and the proletariat
Old Leninist-type commie code words, those.

Latest and greatest neo-soc code words, "working people" and 'the
progressives'.

Same bull.
Lock step & leadership
He's projecting. 'Cause he's impressed with the European continental
National-Socialists of the last century. Which is obviously where his
head is.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/907453/posts
Richard Rongstad
2004-02-20 07:10:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dem Sen Robert KKK Wizard Sheets Byrd
Post by Ken
silentotto
'workers' and the proletariat
Old Leninist-type commie code words, those.
Latest and greatest neo-soc code words, "working people" and 'the
progressives'.
They really like to say "working families". Andrew Hammer, writing
in The Socialist (Socialist Party USA official rag), said that
they prefer to be called progressives rather than liberals.
Post by Dem Sen Robert KKK Wizard Sheets Byrd
Same bull.
Agreed.
Post by Dem Sen Robert KKK Wizard Sheets Byrd
Lock step & leadership
He's projecting. 'Cause he's impressed with the European continental
National-Socialists of the last century. Which is obviously where his
head is.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/907453/posts
Silentotto
2004-02-19 12:56:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by COL RSJ
Who gives a fuck. The lady that caused roe v wade is now agianst
abortion and prolife. Some of us do grow up when we get older, the
rest stay democrats.
Don't worry...

Their working like mad to find a cure for Alzheimer's.

Perhaps you've still a chance at recovery.
da truth
2004-02-25 22:45:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by COL RSJ
Who gives a fuck. The lady that caused roe v wade is now agianst
abortion and prolife. Some of us do grow up when we get older, the
rest stay democrats.
Who cares what the lady thinks now. Abortion is about individual choice,
not one lady's opinion over time. If it weren't her, it would be someone
else who drove this matter of individual liberty to the Supreme Court. If
one doesn't like abortion, one doesn't need to have one - or they can
attempt to persuade others not to. A legal of first trimester terminations
isn't happening anytime soon - so deal with it.
!Jones
2004-02-19 15:19:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Don T
Post by Ted Gittinger
Anybody know offhand how many names the "Block Sender" function will hold?
ted
ROTFLMAO.
How big is your hard-drive? That silencer will hold beau coup. I haven't
select "delete it", and you will kill all the web tv senders en mass. You
can do the same for any other domain would you like to block from your
screen.
Yeah; however, something bothers me about having a computer decide
what I can and cannot read. I don't want one deciding who I should
date either.

(And I definitely don't want the damn thing feeding me hydrocodone as
it always claims it'll do if I'll just click the link!)

Jones
Hows Your Father
2004-02-19 16:31:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls.html
Hows your father?
Is he Carl Levin?

Do you "play" under his desk

while he "works" at it?

=========

Crockett "Cowboy" Davies
Yellow Liberal Biased Journalist
2004-02-19 20:39:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ken
Post by Ken
silentotto
lies and cursing
http://www.bennett.com/archives/003459.html

http://www.mediaresearch.org/

http://www.chronwatch.com/editorial/2002-04-03c.asp
!Jones
2004-02-19 22:28:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Well, it makes no sense to me.
!Jones
2004-02-19 15:14:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted Gittinger
Anybody know offhand how many names the "Block Sender" function will hold?
Hee hee... look! We agree on something!

It's a waste of time. Just cast a jaundiced eye on the subject/sender
and move on. You still download all of the headers and that runs on
your client so it's easier to use the delete button than it is to set
up the script and keep it current. If it gets too big, it'll have a
noticeable time cost.

Jones
Silentotto
2004-02-18 07:56:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
No wonder that the DemonRAT bastards are paranoid of Bush #43 and
charging him
with lying about Saddam's Iraqi 2003 WMD.
We're not paranoid Cryin' Cowboy...

He DID lie about Saddam's WMD in 2003.

He lied through his teeth.

He lied like a fucking dog.

He lied worse than you lie.

I know it.

You know it.

Everyone knows it.

You're a slime mold.

Your lies don't matter.

Bush's do.

Some find it convienient to deny that Bush lied, for political
reasons, hoping they can salvage is disasterous presidency.

But, I know that their lying when they deny it.

You know that their lying when they deny it.

We all know their lying when they deny it.

You can try and smear others if you want.

You can bang out posts demonizing every democrat that ever lived.

That doesn't change the fact that Bush is a liar, that everyone knows
that he's a liar and that we're sending his lying ass back to Texas in
November.

You can rage, Cryin' Cowboy...

You can foam at the mouth...

You can post more lies...

You can post lying quotes from Limbaugh, Savage, Hannity and Fox...

But you can't stop people like me, millions and millions of us, from
tossing Bush out of office and electing a Democrat in his place.

Eat your liver, and spew your bile.

Because you can't stop it, Cryin' Cowboy.

Hahahahahahahaha...



=======================

Greed is all right, by the way. I think greed is healthy. You can be
greedy and still feel good about yourself. --- Ivan Boesky


A Satanist will not hesitate to admit to being self-centered, selfish
and hard and will tell you that you too, have all these qualities in
abundance. Satanism is a wholly self-centered philosophy. --- Anton
Levey
Ken
2004-02-18 14:58:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On 17 Feb 2004 23:56:15 -0800, ***@hotmail.com (Silentotto)
wrote:

Bet you can't get your point across with out all the lies and cursing.
Internet Rule #1 those that resort to name calling to get their point
across, loses.
You lose.

Ken
11Bravo
Post by Silentotto
Post by Yellow Dog Liberal Biased Journalist
with lying about Saddam's Iraqi 2003 WMD.
We're not paranoid Cryin' Cowboy...
He DID lie about Saddam's WMD in 2003.
He lied through his teeth.
He lied like a fucking dog.
He lied worse than you lie.
I know it.
You know it.
Everyone knows it.
You're a slime mold.
Your lies don't matter.
Bush's do.
Some find it convienient to deny that Bush lied, for political
reasons, hoping they can salvage is disasterous presidency.
But, I know that their lying when they deny it.
You know that their lying when they deny it.
We all know their lying when they deny it.
You can try and smear others if you want.
You can bang out posts demonizing every democrat that ever lived.
That doesn't change the fact that Bush is a liar, that everyone knows
that he's a liar and that we're sending his lying ass back to Texas in
November.
You can rage, Cryin' Cowboy...
You can foam at the mouth...
You can post more lies...
You can post lying quotes from Limbaugh, Savage, Hannity and Fox...
But you can't stop people like me, millions and millions of us, from
tossing Bush out of office and electing a Democrat in his place.
Eat your liver, and spew your bile.
Because you can't stop it, Cryin' Cowboy.
Hahahahahahahaha...
=======================
Greed is all right, by the way. I think greed is healthy. You can be
greedy and still feel good about yourself. --- Ivan Boesky
A Satanist will not hesitate to admit to being self-centered, selfish
and hard and will tell you that you too, have all these qualities in
abundance. Satanism is a wholly self-centered philosophy. --- Anton
Levey
Dem Sen Robert KKK Wizard Sheets Byrd
2004-02-18 22:49:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ken
lies and cursing
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/907453/posts
Silentotto
2004-02-19 06:15:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dem Sen Robert KKK Wizard Sheets Byrd
Post by Ken
lies and cursing
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/907453/posts
So Robert Byrd is a scum bag.

That's supposed to be news?

I don't get to vote on who W. Virginia elects to the Senate.

If he tried to run in Michigan we would laugh him out of the state.

On the other hand, I do get to vote on who is going to be President.

And, I'm not going to vote for a lying, hypocritical, corporate shill
like Bush.

Neither are a hell of a lot of other people.

He lied about Iraq. He's an obvious tool of big bussiness and the
power elite.

And now we learn that he's a hypocrite on the abortion issue.

He cravenly panders to the religious right.

He wraps himself in the banner of rightiousness.

Yet when he was faced an unwanted pregnancy, abortion was a fine
solution for him.

He makes me sick.

We're going to send him right back to Texas along with the rest of the
lying crooks he installed in Washington.

You can post all the links about Robert Byrd you want.

It won't save Bush's ass come November.

We're voting him out. Sending him packing. Giving him the boot.
Shipping him on down the line. Deep sixin'em.

And, there isn't a damn thing you can do to stop it, Cryin' Cowboy.

You can whine about it.

You can quote your favorite fascists.

You can rant and rave.

You can cyberstalk those who see you for the greedy, selfish, lying,
two dollar Republican whore that you are.

But you can't save Bush or his cronies.

You might want to think about dumping your few measly shares of
Haliburton common stock. Once we get a administration that they
haven't bought lock stock and barrel looking into what they've been up
to...

Well, it probably won't be pretty.

It looks like you'll have to give up on your plans to make a living
sponging off the corruption of the government.
Bud & Gom
2004-02-18 15:28:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
we'll see.












www.WhiteHouse.org
Bud & Gom
2004-02-18 15:31:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
JFK = JOHN F. KERRY












www.WhiteHouse.org
Another Piece of DemoCRAP
2004-03-06 08:23:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
National Enquirer
The gossip rag that was so very credible to Liberal news-anchors for
Rush Limbaugh's prescription oxycontin addiction but *not* so credible
to the very same Liberal news-anchors for John _Fonda Kerry's
"sleazeball" accusation from young Alexandra Polier's father?
Post by LeftTenant Ketchup Boy FlipFlopGigolo
Bawney Fwank's wimp-dicked wittle wover
"da twooff" drooled this drivel out the anus
< i am an anti-War on Terror coward of the Nth degree.
i am deathly afraid of the Islamo-Fascist terrorists.
i think we should appease them all at all costs.
now, let me go back to sticking my head in the sand
while Bubba da Clumsy 'n' Goofy Gangsta sticks his
pencil-whipping dick up my pussy-like spooge-spattered ass.
OOO000ooo! i *like* that! meanwhile, i must ignore
the truth about myself and my out-of-power piece of
DemoCRAP Party or i'll go all-the-way insane. >
Neo-Commie butt punk ostrich.

?Can't face these truths, can you, douche bag?:

"[W]e begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."

- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI) Sept. 19, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
.. [W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent
grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Jan. 23, 2003.


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."

- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Forbes Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and
developing weapons of mass desruction."

- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA) Sept. 27, 2002.


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

- Sen. John Forbes Kerry (D, MA) Oct. 9, 2002.

=== === === === === === === === === ===

John Forbes Kerry, his post-Vietnam War, pro-Communist, anti-war,
anti-U.S. military Congressional Testimony in 1971, and what fellow
Vietnam Veterans and other military personnel now think of his
traitorous actions 33 years later:

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040219-115623-9539r.htm

http://www.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/JohnKerryTestimony.htm

http://www.geocities.com/seavet72/AW/ws-kerry.htm

http://www.fakewarriors.com

http://johnkerry.blogspot.com/

http://www.soft-vision.com/hanoi/larson

===== ===== =====

former President William Jefferson Clinton's explanation of why he
launched military strikes against Saddam Hussein's Iraq:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
Loading...